Suggestion: Non-Craftable Boston Boom-Bringer at 2.66 ref

Price Suggestion

~29 ref

115 votes up

73 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Wed, 29 Apr 15 03:04:36 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Price drop, maybe?

Sellers @ 2.66 ref:

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25766577[/url]

~~http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25802117~~ Sold.

Plenty of unsolds @ 3 ref:

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25766516[/url]

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25781915[/url] (backpack.tf price)

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25790782[/url]

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25786241[/url]

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25788526[/url] (backpack.tf price)

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25756179[/url] (backpack.tf price)

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25789903[/url]

1 poorly bumped trade doesnt change a price.

besides, 3 ref is a common trading point and shouldnt be left out. eitherway this suggestion is invalid cause of the 2.66 seller

downvote sorreh, but good try

2 sales at 2.66, and unsolds at 3.

Prove that 3 is still a common trading point instead of just saying it is.

And it's a drop in price, the seller would make the suggestion more valid if it hadn't sold yet, not less.

"Prove that 3 is still a common trading point instead of just saying it is."

Ok not sure if you're telling me to prove it to you but those sellers are the proof. unless you're saying poorly bumped isnt even sellers

you uh, checked the 2.66 seller, right? it's invalid.

did you realised that 1 of the "2" of the 2.66 sales was a quicksale? he just countered himself, big time.

as an orange belt you should've already knew all these and not need me to explain it to you.

edit: disliking proves my point tyvm haters

Yes, there are multiple sellers, and no sold proven, save for the one post below, which would indicate a range is needed.

The seller has been open for 4 days and is still on the first page when you search for sellers and can be seen easily.

Range would be better now that 3 can be proven as a selling point.

You still dont get it, poorly bumped trades are NOT proof. also, the other sale was a QS, and a guy below sold 1 for 3 ref easy, wich means this dosnt need a drop.

btw, what's with all these dislikes

I suppose that depends on what your definition of poorly bumped is then. The trade has been open for four days and there's no way to tell how often it was bumped previously. If the trade had never been bumped I would be agreeing with you, but due to how long it's been open, I don't consider it to be poorly bumped. If you can post to somewhere a mod as defined poorly bumped, it would be appreciated.

I think it's because you're implying that sellers indicate common trading points.

that's not what im talking about. i was talking about the 2.66 seller

OKAAAAAAY! anyways, we can take the seller as poorly bumped since it hasnt been bumped in a day.

also, this doesnt need a drop, 2.66 QS'd and 3 ref sells as stated below.

You, in response to being asked to prove that 3 ref is the common trading point: "those sellers are the proof."

I'm just pointing out that that's probably why you're getting dislikes. Nothing more, nothing less. And you disliking my comment doesn't change that.

i didnt dislike your comment, some other idiot who hates on me did. I dont hate on comments when there's no insult. i hope you arent the one who hates on me for being normal :P and yes, i kinda proved 3 is common atm :3

Sold my easy 3 ref 30 min. ago - http://i.imgur.com/wf6ZKK7.jpg

I already bought the second one, first one is poorly bumped, downvoting

These unsolds don't have it in BP.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25789903

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25790782