Suggestion: Ol' Geezer at 1.44–1.88 ref

Price Suggestion

~1.44 ref

119 votes up

65 votes down

Related Suggestions

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Allright lads, this one is first one for me, so don't be too harsh, tell me if I'm doing something wrong.

Sellers:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25869268 1 ref (note how badly he wants to get it off of himself :P)

Buyers (there are no buyers that buy this hat specificaly - they only buy all craft hats cheap, but if you want to, here they are):

CAUTION: May contain grammar mistakes :P

not in the range^

Sorry, can you explain what you want to tell me here? I don't quite understand :/

he said sellers doesnt equal sales, but thats for raising a price, your lowering it and you can use sellers for lowering

Okay, thanks :)

Sale at 2 ref

Most of your sellers are very bad bumped, or not bumped at all

Buyers don't influence anything in making suggestions unless at a higher price than bp.tf.

Okay, thanks :)

"Lads"

>:C

whats wrong? :D

I was half kidding, but we're not all male. :P

Sorry, I just like that for word :D. So maybe you know how to say "lad" for females :D?

I know, it's cool, I'm only kiddin. :P The female version of 'lad' would be 'lass' :)

Okay, then in next suggestion if I ever make one again I'll say "Allright lads and lass's" :P. Thanks!

1. Your sellers are badly bumped.

2. You're raising the low-end, so you need to show sales at 1.44

3. 1.33-1.66 would be a better range, not 1.44-1.88. But your proof is too poor to pass.

4. Buyers don't mean anything.

Okay, thanks :)