Suggestion: Strange Australium Flame Thrower at 15–16 keys

Price Suggestion

~24.2 keys

60 votes up

24 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Fri, 15 May 15 20:30:33 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Resuggesting with a range.

2 month old price.

3 pages on Outpost, barely any clean ones.

Seller at 15: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25840450 (well bumped, but changed price.)

Sellers at 16:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25951553 (auto-bumped, young)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25946362 (1 day)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25928611 (unbumped, 3 days)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25897859 (unbumped, 6 days)

Rest on Outpost are either offers or unclean

Any supporting evidence would be nice

Unbumped=invalid

That is why he made it a range

Last time I checked, invalid proof means there is no point in including it in the suggestion. Dunno what you didn't get from that.

There isn't sufficient proof to exclude 16 from the range

He does need to take the unbumped out of the suggestion but his proof that is valid is still good considering the relatively small market for the item. You can't expect his suggestion to be perfect, he's only a white belt. But this is still one heck of a suggestion for a white belt.

All I'm saying (that goes to both of you) is that the sellers that haven't bumped their trades in a while serve no purpose, and should be removed. Neither did I say anything about being a white belt, nor about the range.

Seriously, what is so confusing about my comments?

*facepalm*

What we are saying is that he should remove the unbumped sales from the suggestion but he needs to include some proof that 16 is still a viable part of the range, and as homework said there are not enough sellers on the market to provide any more proof.

Read my first two comments again, word by word. Tell me where I mentioned the word "range".

Now, tell me why are we fighting over a misunderstanding.

It doesn't matter if YOU said it at all. WE are pointing out why he needs them.

Which is irrelevant to my comments, but anyway, let's stop spamming this suggestion with comments.

good proof