Price Suggestion
darkblaze
Unusual Powdered Practitioner Darkblaze
95 votes up
47 votes down
Advertisement

This suggestion was closed by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Only one recent sale.


While this is a dupe, I'll use a comment from the previous owner's trade to explain the scenario:


http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24946513

"Darkblaze Powdered Practitioner: b/o 80 keys

--Duped, one of four dupes, but all other dupes have stayed put since (at last check) August 2014. The single non-duplicated one has apparently never come on the market."


Sold for a stormy stash (56*.9) + 25 pure = 75 keys

His bp:

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198056080374?time=1431673200 ->

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198056080374?time=1431759600


My bp:

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198025114705?time=1431673200 ->

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198025114705?time=1431759600

    Whilst I'd probably agree with this if the clean version had never been traded, it's moved around in the past: http://backpack.tf/item/2037541377


    I don't see why this should go through. I'd rather leave a hat unpriced than based off a duped variant if the clean one is still around.

      Doesn't matter if the clean one has ever been on the market or not. It's unfair to the owner of the clean one to price this with a duped sale.

        Well that might be true on its own, although I have my doubts that the clean one would sell for more than 75 keys.

        http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/21420661 - had a b/o of 7 buds, last known trade.

        All speculation tho, not sure.

      Isn't there a way for Premiums to track down who owns Unusuals, and the history's of them?

        Yes, that is what premium does.

        23 days must be a new record

          Thanks for the suggestion, but it just wouldn't be fair to the clean owner to price this off the dupe. We shouldn't punish someone for wanting to keep their hat just so we can price the duped one, especially since it has sold in the past.