Suggestion: Non-Craftable Iron Bomber at 1 ref

Price Suggestion

~0.08 ref

106 votes up

67 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Sat, 23 May 15 00:59:07 +0000 by [GIRL] Mr. Bucket.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Put this to sell at 0.88 once, someone used it to suggest a new price :v

Really small market:

Sold mine some time ago for 1 ref:

http://i.imgur.com/IUpLjyu.png

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25875313#latest

- Few other sellers on tf2outpost or bazaar.tf - one swapping for the same weapon with a different level, another selling set of uncraftables

- One buyer at an exact price - again, one person swapping for same weapon with different level

Links involving the item, but not really useful to this suggestion:

- http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25905192 Swapping weapon for another level

- http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25874531 Selling set of uncraftable weapons

- http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25977501 Selling for a taunt (?)

- http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25997129 Buying for 0.33 ref

- http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24785932 Swapping for normal weapon

Tell me if I did anything wrong... This is my first suggestion where I actually read the more detailed rules :P

12 days is a little borderline, but it should be okay.

Should I wait more to do this suggestion then?

Personally, your sale is the only proof of value for this item so I'd leave it up :P

Oh wow I understood something completely different from what you meant... I see, the trade is kinda old but yeah, I guess it still is the only valid on the market :v

Edit: Checked the price suggestion rules again, they say that for rare, low-value items you can and may include old trades, as these are kind of difficult to find, so yeah, should be fine, as you said

Keep it up. The proof is sufficient enough to raise the price, especially since it's an uncraftable weapon.

Bought one at a ref not long ago, hope this helps http://puu.sh/hVNKg/3a680fb6b7.png

Cool, and it's a younger trade than mine :)

This is relevant supporting evidence.

Hopefully this suggestion gets accepted.