- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Hats. Nuff said.
Hurr durr dis hat is gud i think it shud go up hurr durr
Seller(s) at 1.55
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25984585 (4 days old)
Sellers at 1.66
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25912815
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26031103
Classifieds at time of posting:
1 x 1.55
1 x 1.66
Most probably a conservative drop.
Edit: Your seller at 1.55 Refined is invalid for now. Downvote for now.
Your 1.55 seller is invalid as it is poorly bumped.
Doesnt the one in classified count? I thought classifieds could also be used as main proof now
"Classifieds listings: We are now accepting classifieds listings as primary proof provided that they meet certain criteria. First and foremost, you MUST provide a screenshot of classifieds in your suggestion....for rare items, the number of sellers at a given price must be greater than the total number of trades up on outpost or other sites." (from http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/36705-guide-for-non-unusual-suggestions/ ) In this case you have 1 seller at 1.55 which isn't enough.
For being poorly bumped, the 1.55 trade seems to have gotten more views than the 1.66 trades, i think the bump might not matter :P
Also, one of the 1.66 trades sold, (which i thought it had but wasn't sure as it wasn't in their backpack; hence leaving 1.66 in the range.
I meant the current range is fine.
A couple in classifieds for even less now. 1.55-1.66 is probably better than 1.66 flat. Going with the votes