Price Suggestion
~20400 keys
arcana
Unusual Virtual Viewfinder Arcana
31 votes up
61 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

    he traded with a PP scammer?

    To reply to what you said earlier:

    http://www.tf2outpost.com/user/76561198143083940 alt of account below

    http://www.tf2outpost.com/user/683139 Pending SteamRep scammer report


    Range is far too wide

      Oh... a pending report that was ignored for over 8 months... now i know what you meant.

        Yes. So that sale is invalid, and otherwise an obvious outlier.

          Couldn't the pan sale be an outlier?

            The sale would be invalid so it would be as if it never happened, so no it wouldn't be due to the fact that it is the "only" sale

              Only if the scammer in question was the guy that traded the View with the PE BOA... but he isn't, he is 3 or 4 owners below in the history of this hat....

              What would be your reasoning behind it being the outlier?

                I do not understand this question, we are here to selectively report sales to form prices we want or are we here to just report on sales and make a just price based upon those sales?

                  If one sale is roughly half the value of another sale, you can be 100% sure that something is not right. One of the sales is an outlier, and you'll have to determine which one in order to appraise the hat. If you say that the pan could be an outlier, then provide why you think its an outlier to make your case.


                  Im quite positive that a sale involving fishy banned users with pending scammer reports are far less likely to properly reflect a hat's value, even if you would consider them valid because they have no official SteamRep mark yet.

                    The thing is, it wouldn't be half the price if the PE BOA would have been priced fairly, at 800, not ridiculously low, at 660.

                      well, provide sales that put the BoA at 800 and make a suggestion; Then come back to suggest this with your new BoA price. By using the BoA's value for this suggestion, you're taking it as the correct value, so I dont see why you would call it 'ridiculously low'.

        that range is far too big, one must be an outlier.

          Could be related to the stupid price suggestion that was accepted for the BOA seconds ago....

          If you think the BOA is priced unfairly then try to suggest it at what you think is the correct value is

            The PE BOA, was IT offered on the Viewfinder? Or was it the Viewfinder that was offered for the PE BOA?

            If, then think about the multiplier by 0.9.

            Additional them might work, I'm not a great suggester, but I know several things although.

            Btw, 90.2% = 0.92, just saying. 1=100% 0.1=10% 0.01=1% 0.9=90%

            Re-suggest might be a clever idea. I'm not judging you mate..

            1100 * 0.92 (90.2%) = 1012 ~1000

            As I've seen it, the high end range is fine, but the PE boa seems like an problem that'll needs to be solved!

            Imo# : I wouldn't do the 660*0.9 since it's a fresh price. Smarter would be that, you look up older sales of the PE BOA.

            Cheers mate and good luck with this suggestion, I'm neutral, due to the PE BOA problem...

                Dream item, I'm jealous \o/

                  Ok, to determine clearly which one of the 2 sales in this suggestion is an outlier we should evaluate this sale I guess.


                  Edit: It's clearly around the low end, a quick math check of it gave me like 550 keys, someone feel free to do the right math and resuggest with the 1000 key sale being an outlier I guess.


                  PS: Yeah I'm aware of most of the owners being banned, so was the guy with the 1000 key sale, but none of them were MARKED scammers at the time of trade, which is the only real rule for such cases.