This suggestion was marked as bad evidence and closed
by Horizon.
There should always be enough evidence to back up the new proposed value.
However, it appears that the evidence is not strong enough, or cherry-picked
in a way that does not represent the actual market value of the item.
Therefore, this suggestion has been closed.
Message left by moderator:
No proof that it was being offered (you had 18 days to provide it). And please don't use decimals for unusauls.
Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.
The previous suggestion stated, "Sold for Blizzardy Storm Crone's Dome - 96" However this is not true for I was not the seller I was the BUYER, meaning I over-payed him, he DID NOT OVERPAY ME. Making the formula 96 * 0.9 = 86 used in the previous suggestion invalid, instead, me being the buyer the formula should be 106(previous price)*0.9 = 96.4. Proof of my purchase: http://backpack.tf/item/1500993251
And yes I was the buyer. To me this seems just so idiotic that the "rich" people in charge of the economy want to lower the items so much that they didn`t even look in the circumstances of this purchase. THEY JUST LOWERED THE PRICE. Want to know what really happened? I wanted to help out a friend by giving mass-overpay and helping his backpack, instead some kind of stalker instantly brought the price down.
I applied overpay as there was no clear indication on who offered, unless you can prove you offered, the price is fine as it is.
I made the offer, the price is not fine, because I made the offer, and you made my friend lose money when it was supposed to be the other way around.
Then prove it, I did nothing wrong as there was no clear indication on that you offered.
Stop crying about it, this suggestion in it's current state is pretty much manipulation as you're not proving you offered, your words are not enough, as aaron already posted:
Standardized overpay
If unclear which hat was offered, DO calculate overpay.
u have no proof either. So i calculated overpay but in another direction.
Well you obviously can't read English, so ill pass on trying to talk sense with you.
If you offered the Crone's on the Ninja Hood, and the Ninja Hood wasn't offered on the Crone's, it means that the Crone's needs to have overpay applied anyways. Whether you were the seller or buyer doesn't matter at all.
Suggestion rules are suggestion rules, and you should abide by them.
i offered the ninja on crones
Welp, I misread. Sorry about that.
You'd still need proof that you actually offered on it however, otherwise it's implied that it's the other way around.
thank you
In the same way hex had no proof that i didnt offer.
pro-tip, there's an edit button, and it works
also you should be rounding :u implying too high a degree of accuracy in pricing for an item this expensive
I offered on the Ninja
atleast round...
Any evidence to show that you offered the ninja on the crones? No offers on outpost stated as such and therefore it was treated as "unclear"
If unclear which hat was offered, DO calculate overpay.
" I wanted to help out a friend by giving mass-overpay and helping his backpack, instead some kind of stalker instantly brought the price down." This sounds like a manipulation.
I really hope that Miss Leading is able to find a suitable husband soon
I OFFERED THE NINJA ON CRONES
THE PREVIOUS SUGGESTION WAS MISS-LEADING
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The previous suggestion stated, "Sold for Blizzardy Storm Crone's Dome - 96" However this is not true for I was not the seller I was the BUYER, meaning I over-payed him, he DID NOT OVERPAY ME. Making the formula 96 * 0.9 = 86 used in the previous suggestion invalid, instead, me being the buyer the formula should be 106(previous price)*0.9 = 96.4. Proof of my purchase: http://backpack.tf/item/1500993251
http://backpack.tf/item/3400293540
Previous and invalid suggestion: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/556f93c1b98d88790c8b4568
And yes I was the buyer. To me this seems just so idiotic that the "rich" people in charge of the economy want to lower the items so much that they didn`t even look in the circumstances of this purchase. THEY JUST LOWERED THE PRICE. Want to know what really happened? I wanted to help out a friend by giving mass-overpay and helping his backpack, instead some kind of stalker instantly brought the price down.
I applied overpay as there was no clear indication on who offered, unless you can prove you offered, the price is fine as it is.
I made the offer, the price is not fine, because I made the offer, and you made my friend lose money when it was supposed to be the other way around.
Then prove it, I did nothing wrong as there was no clear indication on that you offered.
Stop crying about it, this suggestion in it's current state is pretty much manipulation as you're not proving you offered, your words are not enough, as aaron already posted:
Standardized overpay
If unclear which hat was offered, DO calculate overpay.
u have no proof either. So i calculated overpay but in another direction.
Well you obviously can't read English, so ill pass on trying to talk sense with you.
what a nice person! :)
item 150099 link doesn't work
ill fix heres the replacement http://backpack.tf/item/1500993251 http://backpack.tf/item/3400293540
i fixed the error
I downvoted before reading because of the .4.
If you offered the Crone's on the Ninja Hood, and the Ninja Hood wasn't offered on the Crone's, it means that the Crone's needs to have overpay applied anyways. Whether you were the seller or buyer doesn't matter at all.
Suggestion rules are suggestion rules, and you should abide by them.
i offered the ninja on crones
Welp, I misread. Sorry about that.
You'd still need proof that you actually offered on it however, otherwise it's implied that it's the other way around.
thank you
In the same way hex had no proof that i didnt offer.
pro-tip, there's an edit button, and it works
also you should be rounding :u implying too high a degree of accuracy in pricing for an item this expensive
I offered on the Ninja
atleast round...
Any evidence to show that you offered the ninja on the crones? No offers on outpost stated as such and therefore it was treated as "unclear"
http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-guide-for-unusual-price-suggestions/
Standardized overpay
If unclear which hat was offered, DO calculate overpay.
" I wanted to help out a friend by giving mass-overpay and helping his backpack, instead some kind of stalker instantly brought the price down." This sounds like a manipulation.
I really hope that Miss Leading is able to find a suitable husband soon
i like your pun ill fix