Suggestion: The Beastly Bonnet at 1.55–1.66 ref

Price Suggestion

~1.66 ref

137 votes up

66 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Thu, 25 Jun 15 18:07:54 +0000 by A Delicious Cashew™.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

The Beastly Bonnet

Suggested Price: 1.55 - 1.66 ref

Proof:

Sale at 1.66 ref:

http://i.imgur.com/vMjR62f.png

Seller at 1.55 ref:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26134816

Seller at 1.33 ref:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26164341

1.55 seller is poorly bumped. You should have stuck to 1.33 to 1.66

Two buyers at 1.33. The 1.55 has been bumped more often than the 1.33.

You should listen to people with some experience <3

It hasn't been bumped for a day, unless you have some special privilege that allows you to see how much it has been bumped then I have no idea how you know how many times it has been bumped

1.33 is 22 hours old, 17 hours unbumped

1.55 is 4 days old, 1 day unbumped.

It's common sense.

The buyers negate the crappy 1.33 seller anyway.

Who's to say he bumped it those 3 days in-between. You can't just assume that he's been bumping properly those 3 days before the recent bump. What if he just figured out how to bump it after 3 days of selling it. he could have bumped it once a day. If anything both sellers are invalid

I've proven the range valid multiple times regardless of the sellers. You're arguing a triviality.

Drop it. Before you embarrass yourself any further.

You've proven it with the sale you provided. I'm saying that the 1.33 seller and 1.55 seller are both invalid. I know you're experienced but I firmly believe that along with the 1.33 seller that the 1.55 seller is invalid but your 1.55 sale supports OP's range.

http://puu.sh/ikdtR/62023deb69.jpg Sale at 1.55(ish)

He should use that instead of the seller at 1.55 which is poorly bumped.

He is, now. I just found it.

Please keep the comment section clean.

http://i.imgur.com/OyPEQ3T.png Two buyers at 1.44 and some sellers at 1.66

Looks good, upvote.