Suggestion: Disco Beat Down Company Man at 40–47 keys

can't tell what is it sold for, something enough to buy an aussie knife and collector spec ks gunslinger but total change in value seems to be lower than 40, supporting proof

^ok nvm found

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198026659536?time=1434006000 before

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198026659536?time=1434178800 after

sold for pro ks sniper rifle

0.9 x 44 = 40

mini for pro ks sniper

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26269764 sold at 44 keys

unsold at 53

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/556118beb98d88ae618b45a0

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25711249

current seller at 40

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26324394

Not sure if outlier or not.

Sold mine for a Cloud 9 Yellow Belt.

I can post a trade history image if you want

for the first sale why did you x 1.1?

"the guy offering more items is overpaying?" dbd guy is overpaying since hes offering more items, i could do 46.5 / 0.9 too but the answer would be close to my previous answer

overpay is calculated by x 0.9, no overpay you just leave it as is. but there is no such thing as reverse overpay ( x 1.1)

overpay: 0.9 x A = B, where A = x (unusual we want to calculate) + y (some other sweets), so to calculate x which is within A, we take B / 0.9, which can be rounded off to 1.1 x B and some other further calculation

In the above senario, dbd company was offered together with pro ks vintage backburner for searing tree, A= dbd company + pro ks , B = searing tree

that's not how it works

if you know person A is overpaying person B, and the unusual you wanna calculate is from person A, logically you take B's value divide by 0.9. Can an admin help?

like i said, that's not how it works. if the suggested hat was offered on another unusual(s) then no overpay is required. if another unusual(s) was offered on the suggested hat, you times by 0.9.

That makes no sense mathematically, you multiply it by 0.9 to find it's actual value.

In the above senario, you divide it by 0.9 to find it's actual value.

that's the rules to unusual suggesting

so what do you suggest it to be?

searing tree is outdated anyways so you need a mini for that and i'm not seeing your mini for the vintage pro backburner

http://backpack.tf/stats/Unusual/A%20Rather%20Festive%20Tree/Tradable/Craftable/15 searing isn't outdated, 2 months old

i am using bptf price for the pro ks, http://backpack.tf/stats/Vintage/Professional%20Killstreak%20Backburner/Tradable/Craftable guess it's now 3 keys...

he didn't sell for a searing tree, he sold for a vivid tree

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198114204564?time=1434234335 before

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198114204564?time=1434265200 after

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26183451

range seems fine, sold for dp brainiac and dp virtual reality

i'm not seeing a dp virtual reality in his bp? i'm seeing an aces high safe n sound

thanks , they looked the same to me lol

well aces high safe n sound is outdated

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/55b0229bba8d88880b8b456e The vivid plasma tree in the first sale is updated now at 49 keys.

Blaze is right about the overpay here. You shouldn't be doing * 1.1. If the company man was offered on the vivid plasma tree, no overpay is needed on both sides of the equation. If the tree is offered on the company man, then you should do overpay on the tree by multiplying 0.9.

There isn't anything suggestive of who offered on which hat in that sale. However, with or without overpay applied, the change in the range is small and doesn't warrant a resuggest. This is close enough,