Suggestion: Strange Atomizer at 2.66 ref

Price Suggestion

Strange Atomizer

Submitted Mon, 06 Jul 15 09:20:00 +0000 by ★ Mason

84.71%

2.66–3 ref

2.66 ref

~51.5 ref

144 votes up

26 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Mon, 06 Jul 15 21:35:04 +0000 by Puddilicious.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Needs a drop, only 2 pages on outpost.

Unsolds at 3 ref:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26366498 (1 day)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26319452 (6 days)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26327737 (5 days)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26240567 (2 weeks)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26340426 (4 days)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26363214 (1 day)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26338341 (4 days)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26358464 (2 days)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26339004 (4 days)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26358315 (2 days)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26189767 (3 weeks)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26134094 (4 weeks)]

Seller at 2.77

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26329213

Seller at 2.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26347762

Classfields

1x 2.33 ref

7x 2.66 ref

1x 2.77 ref

1x 2.83 ref

http://prntscr.com/7pcs2d

SCM somewhat agrees with the drop.

Counters/Additional proof i welcome.

Proof seems alright. Kinda wary of the seller at 2.66 though because if it sells then I'm pretty sure you don't have much proof for your low end.

Please don't tell me classifieds has enough proof to justify low end

But classifieds do have enough proof to justify the low end and can be used for it.

~~Sigh...what did I say?~~

You need at least 10.

Then why didn't you say that In your previous comment? This guy is on white belt and can't just assume that.

It says in the rules... have you read them?

Edit: Also, he is meant to read the rules, I should have no reason to explain that to you or to him. Please don't criticise me for something I didn't do, that I don't have to do.

Actually is you have read the rules http://backpack.tf/rules it says nothing of the sort. It mentions it somewhere in making a good price suggestion thread.

Have you read the rules?

Yes I have, I also wasn't clear then. When I say rules, I mean the rules you mentioned, and, all the forum threads regarding how to make price suggestions. Either way, this is off the point, I was simply alerting him to the fact that he should obtain more links at 2.66 refined because if it sells then the proof for low end is somewhat lacking.

Hopefully he reads all this and also decides to read the forum threads.

@Musix he doesn't need 10 unless he's only using classifieds as main proof. otherwise its just support proof.

@Poshtoffee it does state you need atleast 10 on classifieds for a common item like this: http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/36705-guide-for-non-unusual-suggestions/

Seems good, 2.66 buyer is too badly bumped to use

upvote

I'll spam you now: Good proof - Upvote