Price Suggestion
~2.55 ref
Unique Deep Cover Operator
142 votes up
111 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Hi guys! I want to suggest a price for this beauty, Helpful criticism wanted ! <3 you all!

Sold Couple of them for a price range of 9-9.66 ref:

http://prntscr.com/7qrof3 - 9 Ref

http://prntscr.com/7qror3 - 9 Ref

http://prntscr.com/7qrp43 - 9.66 Ref

http://prntscr.com/7qrpq4 - 9.33 Ref

TF2.Outpost Sales/Sellers/Solds:

*SOLD* http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26326043 - 1 Week Old, Not in his backpack, 9 Ref as "new items"

*SOLD* http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26361675 - 5 Days Old, 1 reclaimed over backpack.tf high-end price(9.66 ref total), the lvl 34 (crafted , that is in his trade)doesn't appears in his backpack, only a lvl 84 one

*SELLER* http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26378992 - 3 Days Old, Somebody added him to buy(idk if it's in his friend list)

*SELLER* http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26370682 - 3 Days Old, Bumped some minutes ago, 12 ref

ALSO, OTHER SELLERS ARE TAKING ITEM OFFERS/OFFERS /UNKNOWN PRICE( THEY SAID BACKPACK.TF PRICE, IDK WHAT THAT MEANS... 7 Ref? 7.33? I Don't even know dude.....

**BUYERS**

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25740291 - Bumped some seconds ago, 9 ref

Backpack.tf Classifieds:

*SELLER*1 x 9.33 ref, 4 Days Old

*SELLER(S)* 2 x 12 ref, one is the same guy from 3rd Tf2outpost seller(Xosmin)

*BUYER* 1x 9 ref

Thank you for your time, I think I detailed this right!

    Some better formatting would help because looking at it seems like a mess.

      thank you for this help, but everything is fine(without the formatting), right?

      Messy proof is still good proof, it's just harder to tell :P

      BARKBARKBARKBARKBARKBARK

        Thank you little cool pony <3

      Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, I am so nervous right now, and scared, too....

        Don't be, we're just strangers on the internet.

          soooooo... You Will UPvote or DOWNvote?

          Don't be. Some may bark a bit, but we ain't gonna bite. .u.

          Anyway, the proof looks fine to me. It does need some proper formatting, though.

          Upvote!

            thank you ... (Damn Son)

          Looking past the formatting ( :P ) gives you another upvote.

            Thanks. :*