Price Suggestion
Scorching Flames Titanium Tyrolean
Submitted by W3N
~60.5 keys
scorch
Unusual Titanium Tyrolean Scorching Flames
38 votes up
17 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

only 1 sale ever. just happened.

Sold For:

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198177963739

dp tyrant (17keys) + g.fetti stuntman (11.5keys)+4keys

=28.5*0.9=25.65+4=29.65


rounding to 30 keys~


hat was sold to dayz i think

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198066195760

    Might want to see if it goes on the market.

    There is a month for that to happen.

      It won't go on the market, especially considering what the buyer bought it for. Its best to place a price now, then when it does go on the market and if it does sell at a better price we can re-price it.

        So, it'll be fine for you to see "5 KEYS FOR [high-tier hat\effect name]" bakpak approves!!! ?

        Not for me, that's why i'm downvoting. I bet there was an explanation of why we don't do this.

          explain what you mean

            This is a clear outlier (any1 with a bit of experience will instabuy it for that price) and should be left unpriced.

              Yes I was pretty sure this was an outlier, but I wanted to do it anyway to see what the admins will say. As this is the first and only sale of the hat. I will probably close this after feedback from an admin.

      Decided to close this, as this sale was most likely an outlier; and most likely a shark.

      thats pretty cheap xD

      Nice proof, upvote

        Holy fuck i'd buy that for 30 right here and now

          i know right, i think he might have gotten sharked by the buyer...

          dayz is an active trader, I wouldn't be surprised to see this go on outpost soon, and that will de-rail this suggestion


          Might be best to wait for a sale more indicative of this hats value

            This isn't worth what GE does (not that I'd judge hats that way),


            Shouldn't be priced based on that sale,

            http://backpack.tf/vote/id/54cd99dab98d88ce7f8b475a

              I dont see the direct relevance of the slo pok, however i do understand the obvious point in which almost everyone has already realised. ty for restating it.

                This is almost exactly the same scenario as the slo-poke. "Never had a chance on the market, better leave it unpriced"