Suggestion: Sunbeams Master's Yellow Belt at 180–200 keys

Price Suggestion

~991 keys

sunbeams

115 votes up

26 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Mon, 10 Aug 15 22:35:55 +0000 by A Delicious Cashew™.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Resuggesting.

Since the last suggestion was made, I knew this was low.

Sold for 200 Keys

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198054443278?time=1432364400 -> http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198054443278?time=1432450800

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198054443278?time=1432364400&compare=1432450800

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198005574075?time=1432278000 -> http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198005574075?time=1432364400

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198005574075?time=1432278000&compare=1432364400

Sold for Aces High Antlers(74 Keys with Overpay), a Purple Confetti Powdered Practitioner(28 Keys with Overpay), a Roboactive Tungsten Toque(40.5 Keys with Overpay), an It's A Secret to Everybody Ye Oiled Baker Boy(41 Keys with Overpay), and a Disco Beat Down Belgian Detective(31.5 Keys with Overpay)(215 Keys total, Outlier)

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198007474191?time=1435388400 -> http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198007474191?time=1436770800

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198007474191?time=1435388400&compare=1436770800

Sold for 100 Keys, a Nuts & Bolts Team Captain(29 Keys with Overpay), a Circling Heart Engineer's Cap(27 Keys with Overpay), a Green Confetti Towering Pillar of Hats(18 Keys with Overpay) and ~6 Keys in Sweets(~180 Keys total)

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198074921500?time=1435474800 -> http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198074921500?time=1435734000

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198074921500?time=1435474800&compare=1435734000

200 Key sellers

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25916808

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26353282

215 seems high, because of two B/Os at 200 being unsold for a while. 180-200 Keys should be fine.

Additional Proof/Counter-Proof/Constructive Criticism/Feedback is always appreciated.

As the 215 seller the antlers need to be reevaluated I feel or given a mini (not quite sure on the normal way of doing this). I had a recent pure sale for 64 keys (pure) on the antlers to user HAXSAW after being repeatedly out bid for the lower price. I don't see this sale as a particular quick sale or anything like that. I believe the price is 3 months old too

The Belgian detective sold for a Timewarp Robo Slug and sweets (possibly a mini for a slight price raise). I own the other hats still so can't comment on them.

I have no interest in making a pricing suggestion but not sure if this impacts your pricing at all or could perhaps provide more evidence for your range

I didn't count it as a quicksale, I counted it as being valued too high compared to current sellers.

And though the antlers might be too high, I doubt the belgian's current price would be considered low, as the time warp robo slug is outdated in itself. If anything, my sale would fit around the current range. :P

Thanks for the feedback

Perhaps I wasn't clear - I didn't suggest you viewed my sale of the belt as a quick sale. I was referring to my sale of the antlers being significantly below the BP.TF price. I see the antlers as massively too high hence meaning this sale isn't an outlier or isn't suitable for the valuation you gave the trade.

Regarding the Belgian - the slug has just been sold as part of a cash deal with a friend valued in excess of the bp.tf value of the Belgian.

Your range seems accurate but maybe not well evidenced for the high end. You have a sale with some seemingly inaccurately priced hats that you call an outlier when the only other sale you reference is 180 keys. Can buyouts be used fairly to ascertain a high end? You yourself stated that the two 200s have been unsold for a while. It just seemed a little arbitrary.

I think you may have missed the sale at 200 Keys pure. The high end comes from that, not from the B/Os.

Maybe it's not an outlier, but if isn't, as I stated it should fit in the range.

Apologies yes I did - ignore that statement. I agree with what you said, it fits within your range, my issue was with the valuation in it in the first place but as its an "outlier" its not a huge issue. I just wanted to point out that trade was misrepresented. Sorry for any confusion.

This looks better ^^

Yay