Suggestion: The Distinguished Rogue at 1.77–2 ref

Price Suggestion

The Distinguished Rogue

Submitted Thu, 13 Aug 15 22:02:09 +0000 by ★ Jun

63.8%

1.88 ref

1.77–2 ref

~2.22 ref

141 votes up

80 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Wed, 09 Sep 15 22:50:09 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

I'll distinguish your rogue ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

seller @1.77

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26752198

sellers @1.88

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26758764

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26754091

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26740082 (unbumped)

seller @2

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26770816 (young)

sale @2

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26732047 (look at the history by clicking the item)

there is 1 seller at 1.66, but it's completely unbumped and I figured that alone shouldn't set the low end of a range with an invalid seller

I believe your seller at 1.77 ref sold it from the looks of the item's history: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26752198

this is an old suggestion :p

It is, but now it feels more convincing at 1.77-2 ref since they've both sold at that range, right? ;)

yeah sure :D

More proof:

Sold one today for 1.88 ref (pure): http://puu.sh/jKdXr/0d04cea014.png

More proof:

Sold one today for 2 ref (pure): http://puu.sh/jNaBQ/08a472b88c.png

you must have a lot of these

I don't. I just find some and then sell it off. I do have a lot of Aladdin's Private Reserves though.

yeah the sellers seem right but what about buyers and actual sales?

all buyers are under current price, so shouldn't matter

i get that but to change a price shouldnt there be a difference between the buyers as well?

if I'm dropping the price, as long as its below the lowest sales and buyers, all I need is sellers

Eh. I was going to close it since it was such a trivial change, but rynz has been gracious enough to provide several sales here suggesting that a range is indeed better than a flat 1.88. Unlikely 1.88 is the most common trade point.