Suggestion: Burning Flames Le Party Phantom at 130–150 keys

Price Suggestion

~645 keys

burning

53 votes up

44 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Fri, 21 Aug 15 15:00:01 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Hey, just wanted to give a slight update to snowraptor's recent suggestion, as I recently sold mine for 150 keys pure. *Note: most of these sales were found by snowraptor.

Before:http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198090308403?time=1439276400

After:http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198090308403?time=1439449200

Sold for 130 keys

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26498993

https://gyazo.com/4ec54ce39a61b7341597bd8bee40b65b

Sold for 140 keys

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26662403

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198069892390?time=1438930800

Sold for 120 keys (claims more but I can only confirm 120, probably best to just ignore this one also considering the above two sales)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26760471

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198090308403?time=1439362800

Sold for Purple Energy Modest (~144 see http://backpack.tf/vote/id/55cbca29dea9e9fa528b4582 , needs a resuggestion but should be good with the corrected range which I use here)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26221350

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198047239660?time=1435906800

Clean sellers:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26742204 - offers

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26791733 - 145, young

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26564321 - 160 keys, 3 weeks

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26794868 - 150 keys, young

Duped sellers:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26781566 - 140, young... also my trade (acquisition was part of a bulk deal)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26788257 - 125, young

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26786784 - 130, young

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26733200 - no price, unbumped

You need to have a 5% change, this isn't 5%

He's correcting a recently accepted suggestion.. he should be perfectly fine if it's correct.

Even if its not 5%, the price should still be updated to better accommodate the higher prices clean ones are able to sell for, and therefore this new range is wholly appropriate.

I can't be the only one who blind voted.. I don't know how unusual suggestions work, but this looks good from what I can tell. Upvoted.

Plenty of people have corrected recently accepted suggestions, as long as it is correct, like Merndy said, it should be fine.

If the other one is wrong, the other one is wrong. Only thing we can do now is fix it. It'd defeat the purpose of making suggestions if we didn't both to fix it. Atleast this is more necessary than your suggestions to lower a Wartime Warmth from 1.55-1.66 down to 1.33-1.55 based on a sale.

It's not wrong though? He wasn't sure on this sale so ignored it, this sale is adding to the sales in the accepted suggestion not correcting one. This is a 5 key change (2.5 median change) so it's not really necessary. Doesn't hurt though, I guess.

Yeah, I know its not a big difference in price. However, I feel that the new range is necessary in order to better fit the prices at which cleaner hats are able to sell for. My le Party had a 5 person history, which is why I was able to get 150 for it.

Yeah, doesn't hurt. Doesn't really make a huge difference either way tbh.

The other one isn't wrong, per say. Snowraptor just couldn't verify my sale.

I didn't use your sale because I couldn't safely conclude that you did in fact sell for 150. If you could provide a screenshot of your trade history then this correction is fine, I certainly have no objections to setting a new high end with a pure sale.

http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/11525-guide-to-making-a-good-inventory-screenshot/

Ok, snowraptor. I'll be able to provide additional proof of the sale once I return home. Tanks for the feedback.