Suggestion: Sulphurous Brotherhood of Arms at 200–260 keys

Price Suggestion

~225 keys

sulphurous

56 votes up

8 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Mon, 31 Aug 15 16:41:43 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

It really hurts me when people says "Haha owns one manipulation obvs" and then turn out to be manipulating, it really does.

Credit to Chicken and evidently Boom (And Jacob) for sales.

SALES:

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5599f034ba8d88630b8b4661 260

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198027544408?time=1437767284 ~ sold for a scorching beak but added a pro ks aussie grenade launcher ~ sellers at 30

250 - 30 = 220 * 0.9 = 198 = 200

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26859181 - 1:1 with a SFB BoA (Open suggestion at 215), sulph BoA was offered

= 215

Sulph BoA (x) and Phos viewfinder (355*0.9 = 320 ) was sold for an anti-freeze mercs mohawk (offered) (650)

650 - 320 = 330

330*0.9 = 297 rounding to 300 - outlier.

That's if it was offered, which there's no proof of. If it wasn't, the maths is (650 * 0.9) - 355= 230

Let it ride.

Sulph Viewfinder not exist :p

Phos, sorry. I've used the Phos pricing, 'tis but a typo XD

I provided the scorching beak sale and the SFB BOA

"and evidently boom"

ey lmao gent used me.. i mean.. credited me

Chicken, Boom, Jacob and Gent all doing one suggestion, how better could you get?

I have a sarcastic answer for that question but I shall keep it to myself

Thanks for the sales <3

"gent holds his hate for me inside"

Isnt the difference between high and low end the same as the one you called out? Just so we're clear on everything,

Sale 1: the sulph-phosph trade. Since youre using 260, im going to assume that youre referring to the 2nd sale in the phosph suggestion that doesnt include the sulph boa. Okay, 260.

Sale 2: Why is the calculation (250-aussi)*0.9? Shouldnt it be 250 - 30*0.9 = 223?

Sale 3: Why are we using the median here and not 200 or 230?

Sale 4: Prob outlier? I dont see an af mohawk being offered on the other two. So about 290.

Edit: I like how none of the supremely knowledgeable users who downvoted me for asking questions bothered to answer except Gent.

The range wasn't the problem, the value was. And 60 is a smaller number than 70. D'you see how that works?

Sale one isn't the phos-sulph sale, it's the sale from the previous suggestion. Thanks for actually looking at the proof before you complain.

Sale two, you're also wrong but so is that sale, it should be (250 * 0.9) - 30 = 195, which still rounds to to 200.

We're using the median because that's the value of that hat? Stupid question.

Outlier if it is 300. It's hilarious how many people don't know what outlier actually means, jesus.

Look man, I try not to rustle up anyone's jimmies and shit while in this site as much as I can. I try to comment when i feel like there is something productive I can state, and I ask questions when i feel doubts. That doesn't give you or anyone who is supposed to answer the right to be a condescending douche bag. Cut that shit out and try being pleasant to other users for once.

Best way to ask someone to be nice, calling them a douchebag. GG

Yeah, 'condescending gentleman' doesn't sound right.

And anyway, the opening comment "60<70" thing was a Simpsons reference, excuse you and apologies if you didn't get it.

No more spam, please.

Hey Magenta. Nice proof on this one. Just a slight correction on the sale of mine for the AF Mohawk

On the sale for the AF Mohawk, I added 64 keys to the viewfinder and BoA (which supports this range). They must not have shown up in the comparison. And I offered, he didn't so you got it correct it looks besides the fact that I added those keys.

So it comes to about 230 anyway, awesome, thanks very much :P

Yep yep! Funny how close it actually was lol.

Oh one more thing Magenta. I saw snowraptor's post and I wondered if my purchase of the BoA should be accounted for. It has a lot of mini's, but more than likely it's on the higher side too. (I may have overpaid by a decent amount just to have it together with the viewfinder).

I bought it for a Duped Cloudy HWNN (Updated at 118 but needs mini) + Bubbling Exe (oudated at 33?) + Duped Peace Topi (outdated at 14?) + Nuts and bolts reggae (outdated at 13) + Aussie medigun (28.5) + 94 pure. I'm not sure what this equates to (I'm at work and can't do much for minis), but it's probably on the higher range. It might be worth taking into consideration, but I'm not sure what it does to either end of the suggestion.

What about my (other) sale?

Sold for Duped Burning Phantom (~120 see mini) + Stormy Storm War Pig (~34) + Misty Skull Noir (~54) + Blizzardy Phantom (~20) + Nuts and Bolts Crones (~29) + 12 keys in sweets = ~269 keys, round to 270

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26298122

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198001759277?time=1439535600

Duped Burning Phantom mini:

Sold for Miami Nights Stout Shako (~18) + Terror Watt Hard Counter (~9) + Spec. Australium Sniper (~34) + Spec. S. Kritzkrieg (~17) + 37 keys + Spoopy Spy Crate (~7) + a bunch of random stuff they decided to throw into the trade (~10 keys) = ~132

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26816893

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198001759277?time=1440831600 (History is a little wonky since I had a busy day of trading so have a quick screenshot http://i.imgur.com/0FilE7I.png )

Going over all the sales; 270, 260, 230, 215, 200 there's really no consistency to be found here. I dislike using any 2+:1 trades when pricing one of the 2+, especially when other sales are available, so I'd rather not see the 230 sale used. The 215 sale they had their "dream unusual" for only a couple days. 200 just seems plain low to me and was used to help raise the price of the beak. http://backpack.tf/vote/id/55ca5075ba8d886e768b4578

If you decide to not raise the low end you can at least raise the high end by 10 keys.

If you want you want do it yourself, this isn't worth the bloody hassle.