Price Suggestion
~50 keys
miami
Unusual Company Man Miami Nights
78 votes up
159 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

The trade post there: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26880869

The buyer: http://steamcommunity.com/id/GiBtm

The seller: http://steamcommunity.com/id/LeQuackz04/

Item's history: http://backpack.tf/item/2352576186


Before talking about this item, I need to tell you I have 1 this item for fair.


Not much people is selling/own this item, and I think because the old price is not good for sell, so this have only 1 sold case.

And I was ask this seller how much keys he was sold, and he tell me: 33 keys.(You can also add that seller for asking the price if you don't trust me)


Please don't let the good effect's unusuals hat price always downgrade, thanks


☣PonyKing™: may I ask you about your Miami nights company man?

Le' Quackz: sure

☣PonyKing™: because I want to make a suggestion in backpack

☣PonyKing™: how much keys you was sold it?

Le' Quackz: i sold it for 33 keys pure


===================

Thank for "ᴾᴾᴹ Shuffle Spy [7309]"

Here is another sale


http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198094737736?time=1434666191: Seller's Backpack After

Sold for a Max's (24 then) + ~14 Keys in Items = 37 Keys after overpay.

    Histories of unusual and items don't match. You have no actual proof of 33 key sale aswell, such as screenshots or timestamps at least.

      Because backpack.tf have delay time for update the owner, if you have try trade with anyone, you can see the same problem.

        Delay isn't that bad. Your sentence changes nothing, you still have no solid proof, that's why i'm downvoting.

          I'm asking for the seller do it, if you want proof, you can also ask for the seller, because if you don't trust me, even the screenshot can use any photo software for cheating(like P.S), so you directly ask the seller is better than I post the screenshot if you don't trust me.

        Please check this out: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198087385815

        That is same item

        http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198077327769?time=1435302000

        http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198077327769?time=1435474800

        Sold with a key for MN Cannonball (outdated)

        http://backpack.tf/vote/id/55c83e45ba8d88d7688b458e Note about cannonball, (it can't be used directly).


        http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198125409130?time=1433401200

        http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198125409130?time=1433487600

        Sold for DP Noble(24). Sale is very old and shouldn't be used, but it is... something.


        And, even you have unsold it for 3 months for 40. That's something aswell. I'd gather more, but premiumless, so whatever. My point is: Untill you prove 37 key sale with screenshot (33 key sale is fine), you have nothing to back up your high range, but two things to prove that it's too high.

          https://www.mediafire.com/?nfe8l4ki80086v4

          This is the proof that seller(Le' Quackz) send to me.

            You clearly missed my point, however thanks, 33 key sale is proven... at least.

              Did you view my images? that is more clearly than the proof you was post in your sugestion post.

              And you can also direct ask the seller. I was posted in my post. that is the best proof.

                That's what i've seen, even corrected to be as much understandable as it is even possible. http://puu.sh/k6J2m/efcb5313b5.jpg 33 keys, as i said earlier.

                You clearly don't understand what i'm trying to say, that's why this will be my last post here, have a good day\night.

                (You might want to learn how to PROPERLY screenshot and how to PROPERLY upload images, if you want people to understand your point.)

        Here is the seller send to me's proof:

        https://www.mediafire.com/?nfe8l4ki80086v4

          No other usable sales and both sales here are pretty much pure. The 37 sale is closer to 36 and a bit old, but I think this is close enough.