Suggestion: Pyromancer's Mask at 6–7 ref

Price Suggestion

Pyromancer's Mask

Submitted Thu, 17 Sep 15 15:33:49 +0000 by ★ Cherry

50.13%

6 ref

6–7 ref

~3.55 ref

574 votes up

571 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Thu, 15 Oct 15 22:47:43 +0000 by Puddilicious.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Guys plz,last time i try this

http://prntscr.com/8hdnwn 6.33 - 6 is bad

http://prntscr.com/8hdo96 6.33 is bad

sold 7 ref

http://prntscr.com/8hd51z

http://prntscr.com/8fgamx

sold 6.33

http://prntscr.com/8fgaxg

http://prntscr.com/8fgb4j

http://prntscr.com/8fgbas

Thanks for feedback ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡°)

Still not enough proof, you need more proof OTHER THAN YOUR OWN TRADES.

Here is my proof from the last suggestion (supports low end)

Sellers:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27046089 - 5.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27049995 - 5.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27049613 - 6

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27039707 - 6

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27038984 - 6 (unbumped)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27034432 - 6 (unbumped)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27002727 - 6 (bp.tf price)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27014617 - 2 sold for 6

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27014562 - 1 sold for 6

Your addition of proof is nice, But doesn't help the poster of the suggestion cause he himself did not look for it while making the suggestion.

He only put in his own trades

Still, downvote.

his own sales are completely valid sales

Despite of them being valid, he should have looked for other proof than his own.

but they're still valid :^)

Regardless of that! He din't care to look beyond his own trades. downvote

If they're successfully sold, they're successfully sold. Doesn't matter if it's his own sales. Plus, you can clearly see supporting evidence in the comments below. You obviously didn't look pass the main post yourself, how ironic. Maybe you should stop being such a hardass about things that don't matter.

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/55fad64bdea9e93e428b45b3 - link to previous suggestion

Valid Sellers/Unsolds

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27039707 - 6 ref(2 days)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26936341 - 7 ref(2 weeks; free paint)

Invalid Sellers/Unsolds

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27049995 - 5.66 ref(young)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27052694 - 6.66 ref(young)

Eh, free paint unsold for two weeks. But you do have two solds. I'll stay neutral on this one.

I had several that were painted with the same color so yes they are moving.

http://imgur.com/vLTe2Cs Sold at 7 ref

Upvote. Sold mine for 6.33 in about 2 minutes with lots of adds and offers

http://i.imgur.com/niOaAnw.png

typically 6th time is never the charm

my sale

6.33 http://prntscr.com/8j5thn

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27080858 - 2 sales at 7 ref here

While your sales at 7 ref mean something, it looks like 6 ref is still a common trading point.

Maybe a more conservative rise at 6-6.33?

He has the original sale at 7, another sold for 7 by Lady Drug, and 2 more sales at 7 posted by mopcko. Don't see anything wrong with the high end there.

What I meant was more that while 7 ref can sell, this might be one of those times where a conservative rise is needed instead of a big rise.

Out of topic, but you still have Windows XP? Not being rude, just amazed to see that there's still people that use a old program... Btw i don't rlly have opinion on this, y don't u remove the "6" ref and change it into "6.33" ref? Seems reasonable.

there are still sellers at 6

Program =/= operating system

This is COMPLETELY irrelevant to the suggestion.

28 days? Really?

QS at 6.66: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27237658

Another one: http://imgur.com/25Nph8B , http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27238880