Suggestion: Orbiting Fire War Pig at 44 keys

Price Suggestion

~47 keys

o.fire

131 votes up

9 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Tue, 22 Sep 15 14:57:27 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

ORBITING FIRE WAR PIG

Needed? Needed.

SALE 1:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26489227 - ghosts samur (mini at 48.5 * 0.9 = ~44)

SALE 2:

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198100514826?time=1439017200

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198100514826?time=1439103600

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26676977 - sold for Time Warp Bubble Pipe (48.5 * 0.9 = ~44)

SALE 3:

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198079349621?time=1442041200

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198079349621?time=1442386800 - sold with MW Hot Aqua Marine Rocket Launcher for MG War Pig?

SAMUR:

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198040902095?time=1440831600

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198040902095?time=1440918000

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26914841 - sold for beams tricorne (barely still at 55 at the time, 55 * 0.9 = ~49)

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198146795212?time=1440226800

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198146795212?time=1440399600

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26852695 - sold for PE tavish crown (very barely outdated at 51, who cares) + 2 keys = (51 * 0.9 = 46) + 2 = 48

48-49.

Sales at 44, 44. Taking 44.

Countering over a key? :/

I need this for another suggestion, and the other suggestion is purely based on an old pure sale.

I want to be as accurate as possible when possible.

Alright, well, I'll just leave you this...

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/542b3c21b98d889a1a8b483d

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH

That was last October, to be fair. I just don't like having a mini-suggestion big enough to work as a fully worked suggestion.

Anyway, this is basically a copy-paste of what I posted on Shuffle Spy's suggestion. If that gets accepted over this, then fair enough I guess.

My point is just that Shuffle provided a single, near outdated sale (which is technically invalid as there are newer sales) that he took from the previous closed suggestion (see here: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/55a8a9e3ba8d88240d8b45da ) and I have provided two usable newer sales. I also don't see a point in rounding when there is no range, but that issue is more subjective and isn't the main problem here.

If there is a problem with this, then I'd like another view on the matter. I don't see how the invalid suggestion @ 45 should be accepted over the fully backed suggestion @ 44.

It was last October, but that doesn't make the situation not exactly the same.