Price Suggestion
~242 keys
robo
Unusual Larrikin Robin Roboactive
81 votes up
36 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Just a bit harder (didn't realize snaggle was duped)


Lets get these minis out of the way


2 scorching flames unusuals in this one, noice


Sale #1

Sold for a DUPED Scorching Flames Ol’ Snaggle (49) + 7 keys

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198003188332?time=1439794800 - 8/15 - 8/17


http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26553830 - B/O of 65


50 + 7 = 57*0.9 = 51.3


50 keys for this sale (outlier)


Sale #2

Sold for a Scorching Flames Nano balaclava (surprisingly clean) (68) + 18 keys

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198003188332?time=1440328033 - 8/23 - 9/04


http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26810648 - had a B/O of 68


68+18 = 86*0.9 = 77


77 keys for this sale


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Minis:


Mini on Scorching Snaggle: 50 keys

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26808468 - 50 - duped seller


Mini on Scorching Flames Nano balaclava (clean):

I could find no recent sales or valid sales on any of the clean Nanos, I swear to god. Doesn’t matter though because he had a B/O of 68

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27020574 - 70

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/26886704 - 75

http://backpack.tf/stats/Unusual/Nanobalaclava/Tradable/Craftable/14 - 75, and a 61 but he’s qs.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


If anything seems off or odd, please comment below and I can fix it, thanks!

    Why are you applying overpay on pure?

    It'd be 68 * 0.5 + 18.


    Only a few keys difference, but evenso.

      It's by *0.9 I thought..


      Would you suggest for me to resuggest?


      It's 68*0.9 + 18 = 79.

        Honestly i think it should be fine its such a small change

      Wait if there was a b/o of 68 on the sale that is being used in the suggestion you must cap the sale at the B/O.

        Crap I didn't see that, thank you for pointing it out, will resuggest.