Suggestion: Collector's Cow Mangler 5000 Chemistry Set at 17 keys

Price Suggestion

~160 keys

74 votes up

29 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Wed, 21 Oct 15 14:48:10 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Sale : http://imgur.com/2CkRNbe

Before : http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198132007350?time=1445324400

After : http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198132007350?time=1445410800

Sold for 17 keys.

Thx to ravenholmzombies for the sale :)

Supportive criticism welcome

The fact that this came with one cow mangler... was it a 199/200 set? EDIT: Just checked, yeah, it was.

This should be used to price the collector's cow mangler. Only 0/200 sets should be used to price the set itself.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27255864 - Pro KS 15 keys

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27244049 - Pro Ks 15 keys

Both Strange also and have parts - one with spells.

Dunno about using this to price the cow

No, lemme rephrase that then. This CANNOT be used to price the set, because set pricing is for empty sets.

If the sale is an outlier for the cow mangler, then it's an outlier. But it -CAN'T- be used here.

The weapons cost 10 ref to collect, and given how huge scrap.tf is, very easy to obtain. Personally, I think this could work, given how rare the sets now are compared to the relatively common completed weapons. Many people pay more for the self-craft hype that can only be obtained through purchasing the set.

That's great. Doesn't justify using a 199/200 set instead of a 0/200 one.

Even if you DID do that, you'd need to subtract the 10 ref, so this suggestion is bunk either way.

Yes, the actual price would be lower, but I'm behind pricing the sets with them being already completed (excluding rarer ones like the Conscientious Objector where collecting the weapons is actually a challenge) since the sales of the Chemistry Sets are glacial, much less frequent than the completed weapons due to their rarity.

Alright, alright calm your horses ill close the suggestion. thx for the feedback anyway :)