- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Haunted Ghosts Frickin' Sweet Ninja Hood
--------------------------------------------------------
Sale #1
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198095828101?time=1443164400&compare=1443250800
Sold for a Skill Gotten Gains Taunt: Buy A Life.
125 * 0.9 = 112.5 ~ 110
PRICE RANGE: 110 Keys flat
--------------------------------------------------------
Showing only 1 trade doesn't count as evidence
Also, your evidence is invaid for 2 reasons:
1- The trade you mentioned happened more han 1 month ago
https://i.imgur.com/iY03tJT.png
2- The trade also happeed before the taunt's price dropped, which you didn't take in consideration
http://backpack.tf/vote/id/560c68e1dea9e96204196261
Anyhow, that's my opinion on this matter.
A unusual sale that's not more than 3 months old is fine.
We have to use recent prices to price unusuals regardless what was the unusual value at the time.
Well, the sales from this suggestion - http://backpack.tf/vote/id/560c68e1dea9e96204196261 - are sales that happened much closer to your trade than the sales in the old suggestion which happened many months ago. We are trying to take items as they were valued at the time of the sale, and the new suggestion is much better for that.
Having said that, an argument could be made that since the taunt was priced at 120-130 based entirely on PURE sales, valuing this at 110 may be a bit low. Maybe going with 120 or 125 here may be better.