Suggestion: Orbiting Planets Employee of the Mmmph at 8 keys

Price Suggestion

~9 keys

o.plnts

83 votes up

40 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Tue, 08 Dec 15 05:04:31 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Here I go again...

Only one up for trade was sold for an australium axtinguisher worth 8 keys.

Proof: https://gyazo.com/4f9c2e25114bad0c573d6386e9dc2209

You can also look into my backpack history if you need too ^-^ I sold it myself.

If I need to add any more proof please tell me , I can add anything. Thank you guys.

Just sold it for 10 keys: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27550335

https://gyazo.com/6c7749379421aee419c2f7d72db90519

You need to apply the overpay multiplier,since the payment was items

Basically:8x0.9=7.2

so suggest around 7

Thats only for unusuals iirc

you recall incorrectly

Anything that isn't considered pure. But australium are commonly bought as pure, so it's really up to the suggestor

There are people who buy any unusual for more than that (myself included)

Then go ahead and buy it. Until that point, this suggestion is valid

Australiums are usually considered exempt from overpay.

7 is ridiculous, quickbuyers will usually pay 7 keys for any unusual

Literally every hat will sell for 8 key which is QS price in every case where the hat is clean. Im 100% sure this would go for more :P

Last suggestion u tried to drop a taunt just based on your one bad sale but there were actually lot of other sales that were significantly higher, i bet its the same case in this one

This is the only usable sale.

Please check before you make that kind of allegation.

uh yea,but it sold instantly to puddington http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27548712

and is on sale currently.

Regardless, if it doesn't resell or receive any higher offers, this is fine.

if it doesn't sell in a month,correct

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27550335

already received an offer of 9

Which evil did just to spite me, I suspect.

I question the legitimacy of that offer, let's see if he goes through with it

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27550335 Sold for 10 keys in less than a day. Since when were quicksales valid evidence to create new prices. LOL

When there are no other sales. Which, at time of publication, this suggestion fulfilled. "Lol."

Obviously now 8 is an outlier.

Moreover 10 didn't quicksell, but merely sold quickly. This is Puddington we're talking about, he would've asked for more if he thought he could get it.

U cant say that 8 keys is "NOW" an outlier since it was that the whole time coz both sales (8 and 10) happened in 24h. Now really im definitely not the guy who should tell ppl what do but really sum common sense should be used b4 accepting these kinda suggestions that (regardless of ones opinion) value hats super low. Theres no need to think that every sale is valid just bcoz the hat isnt priced yet.

You're almost entirely incorrect. Be aware of who you're giving suggestion advice to before you embarrass yourself.

Yes, you can say 8 is NOW an outlier. If that B/O of 10 had sat there unsold for a month, 8 would not have been an outlier. That is not the case.

THAT is the common sense that'd being applied here. Your oversight of that makes your following comment highly hypocritical.

nah,i buy rare-ish low priced hats and flip them on SCM if they are high there.

like the smoking ywn for example.

i do like how you think it's in spite of you. this couldn't pass because there was only one sale and it was on OP at the time

It would have been fine left up and you know it :P

it shouldn't be left up though. He can re-suggest when the time comes, but eh. Either way, i don't see an issue with me offering, would you feel better if i asked someone on my FL to offer instead of me, and then proceed to buy the hat, just so you don't feel threatened or whatever you feel when i offer on hats to point out the truth?

Would have been. Past tense. This is obviously now invalid.

i made more of a... "general statement", but sure.

Does seem low but the proof is there and it outweighs an opinion.

Needs a range at the very least