Price Suggestion
~1.25 keys
Unique The Bitter Taste of Defeat and Lime The Bitter Taste of Defeat and Lime
100 votes up
54 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

    Oh don't be lazy. You could've made this at least an attempt at a suggestion by copy pasting the proof.


    Also when did uncraftable paints come into existence

      Exist. 19, but exist

        That's all well and good - But you still have the problem of being lazy by linking a price that is 3 months old.


        Two things.


        Being Lazy just shows you just don't care

        And using a 3 month old price, is essentially the same concept

          Any proof that price isn't appropriate? Paints don't exactly need refreshing.

            A Decal tool suggestion had the exact same problem, closed due to a 6? month old price.


            http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5622ed31b98d88cb15cc1abf You said yourself that you needed to reprove the range, are you kidding me ._.

              Because there was proof the current price wasn't appropriate. So, off you go, come back with proof :3


              Decal tool had provably changed price in that time.

                All you said was


                "That suggestion is six months old. You need to prove that price is still valid.

                Downvote."


                No mention of counter proof, or a provision of counter proof, anywhere


                Who is to say the Paints didn't change in price over 3 months either? You can't assume such a thing is going to remain constant.

                  It was evident just from a glance over the market. I was probably in a hurry.

                  What you're not contradicting, is that you require counter-proof.

                    Gent, don't change the subject, I don't need to provide Counter Proof but the suggestor needs to provide proof, we're on the fact that you're asking for counter proof yet you yourself proclaimed nothing about providing any, but to prove an old price was in fact still in date.

                      I'm not changing the subject, you as usual won't admit you're wrong. If you can't prove this price isn't right, this suggestion is fine. Fact. End of discussion.

                        I'm not TRYING to prove it's wrong, I'm TRYING to ask for proof that it's right, y'know, like a suggestion is supposed to provide?


                        And again, you can't ask me to prove the "price isn't right", when I still have that snippit of above for the Decal Tool where, you didn't mention Counter Proof, and only the fact the price was months old is what made the suggestion invalid

                          " It was evident just from a glance over the market. I was probably in a hurry. "


                          Now you're just not reading. Counter-proof or fine. End. Of. Discussion.

                            No need to be condescending, but what you're not realising is i'm asking for Proof of why this, 3 month old price, is still valid


                            Not asking for an essay

                            Not going to provide Counter Proof on a Lack of Proof


                            And, again, you still mentioned nothing about Counter Proof, you being in a hurry doesn't excuse such a fact

                              Current open suggestion proves this price is fine.

                              Yes it does.


                              I'll be as condescending as necessary to make you realise you're wrong.

                                How does being in a hurry excuse poor suggesting practices I don't understand


                                If you were in a hurry why were you on bp.tf in the first place that doesn't make much sense

                                  No, you don't.

                                    Alright. If you won't listen to me, how about I use something polar said on that Decal suggestion

                                    Correct me polar if something is ODate here, but it's worth mentioning


                                    "Yeah. That's a 7 month old suggestion" - Said by polar himself, before closing the suggestion.

                                      Open suggestion proves current price is fine. For the second time. Please don't make me say it a third.

                                        Because that's proof, you were previously referring to the 3 month old suggestion and calling THAT valid.


                                        While this price may be incidentally fine, DO NOT claim a 3 month old suggestion is valid for a commonly traded item, that's very very very silly, and you know better

                                          You're lecturing me?


                                          Save your breath, darling.

                                          I'll have my "Gent was right" delivered to my home address, please.

                              Shots. Fired.

                    There is currently a suggestion open on the craftable version to lower the price, if the proof is valid it could be potentially counter proof.

                    https://backpack.tf/vote/id/566752e5ba8d882f68a94c2a

                      All of his one key sellers have sold. Current price is fine.

                Shrekin' people, now that's ENTERTAINMENT!

            whether or not he was lazy (not excusing my behavior), the price range is not correct.


            Sellers at 16 and 17 http://puu.sh/m3Gla/1cab4b4d22.png

              Eh I can forgive you, at least SOME attempt was made

              pls don't do it again tho


              This is just a copy paste of some old price with no proof of supporting it, which is why it's just terrible

              17 ref - 0,97 key according to actual price key - 17.33 - 17.66

              16 ref - 0.91. Only one, where we have these for 17 and rest are for key.

              I would say the price is wrong.


              There is sellers between 16 / 17 refs


              http://imgur.com/d2Yf4Vp


              And pretty sure this needs more proof


              Correct me if i made a mistake

                I repeat

                17 ref - 0,97 key according to actual price key - 17.33 - 17.66

                16 ref - 0.91. Only one, where we have these for 17 and rest are for key


                Class right now:

                1 for 16 - 0.91 key

                2 for 17 - 0.97 - in my range

                7 for 1 key - in my range

                Only one seller is valid to drop price? I don't think so. Also, now craftable version:

                1 for 16

                1 for 17

                4 pages for +1key

                  And i repeat: Needs more proof. :^).


                  Idk, im still new on this ;-;

                    That was counter proof for this 16 ref seller.

                    For me price is fine.

                    If for you is not - give me proof

                Lmao what is this do i need to come back just to fix this ludicrosity

                  The savagery in this suggestion is strong.