Suggestion: Fortunate Son at 4.66–5 ref

Price Suggestion

~1.45 keys

149 votes up

40 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Sat, 23 Jan 16 19:10:30 +0000 by A Delicious Cashew™.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

I like this new update! Except that degreaser nerf. RIP 17/12/15

Well ironically, this cosmetic was from an even more hyped update...

Solds:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27579002 - 4.88 ref

Unsolds:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27581633 - 5 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27586698 - 5 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27516761 - 5.33 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27567832 - "Bp.tf" Price

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27211763 - ^

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27568034 - ^

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27537529 - ^

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27564701- ^

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27564893 - ^

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27558369 - ^

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27585204 - Really weird history, so not sure if it was really sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27587476 - 4.66 ref, unsold still O.o, but invalid =P

Classifieds:

http://imgur.com/hMIdDaT - Many, MANY Unsolds

Any constructive opinion, whether criticism or not, will be valued!

No deco cause...command-C from last suggestion =P. Lazy af I am today. Suggested by polar the mod :D

Either make your intro smaller or move it to the bottom, I almost blind-voted and I'm sure other people will too. Just a heads up ^^

eh, I blind-vote too, no worries

Forgive me senpai for I have blindvoted ;-;

Proof is good, upvoted c:

Thank you, protége, my white belt serves me pretty well :P

I don't see why this intro is blindvote-material, it doesn't state anything about the fortunate son particularily., like, "this item is cool and it deserves a raise".

If it was put in italic and said by a black belt, no one would have blindvoted for sure. :3

thanks! :D

Generally, most people put the intro in italics and or bold.

5 ref should not be in the range, because there have been no solds @5. I'd say resuggest @4.66, you could also include a high end of 4.88 but that sale is getting old now...

Well, but there have been no other sales at 4.88, and all those up for trades are minimum 5 ref, so just take the high-end as a benchmark

It doesn't work like that.