it still baffles me how a 'non-sale' can be included in a price suggestion.....numerous times I've listed a hat at a 'quicksell' price and it hasnt sold for pure within the ludicrous week time-frame but instead sold for items/unusuals more than the 10% overpay rule(another rule that baffles me), yet when the price suggestion hawks come along with their suggestions including these 'non-sales' in the suggestion what should of been a hat valued at a certain price has now dropped to a hat worth a lower price. There is no acknowledgement whatsoever that items/unusuals tend to sell for less than their bp.tf value when it comes to full pure(or even majority pure) offers. The system is broken.

To top it off while I'm at it, when a seller has numerous unusuals and cant possibly keep track of every unusual he has that someone is trying to pass a price suggestion on and the person making the price suggestions are puttting in quicksell trades that were offered privately taht are then used to lower the price of an unusual. It should be that before a price suggestion hawk can lower the price of someones asset the person making the price suggestion should have the onus of proof on them to show that this sale was NOT a quicksell, not the other way around, where the owner need to constantly monitor every unusual they own to make sure someone is not putting through a misrepresented price suggestion.

Trading is bad enough as it is right now, and with all the quicksells around, its seems many people are finding their backpacks quickly depreciating based on erroneous accepted price suggestions that cant be turned around. So for those making price suggestions; if you have nothing better to do than attempt to lower the value of someone else's backpack my advice is to put yourself in the position of the owner of the item and only base your price suggestions on what you know for a fact was not a quicksell trade, and hopefully bp.tf will also ammend the rules to disallow non-trades inot price suggestions(especially considering the variation in offers when it comes to all-pure V's items).

This has nothing to do with me being bitter with the numerous erroneous price suggestions that have been accepted that have involved hats that I've owned at the time, this has everything to do with common sense and the frustration at how someone can lower the value of anyone's asset without what I would call the necessary evidence.

I know in this instance it's actually raising the price, but all things considered(other current prices on the other HWNN effects since it became multi-class) this comes across as more of a price drop from where it looks like it should be now priced at.

To Hhanuska, dont take it all personally just getting it all out here :)

/rant