Price Suggestion
A Hat to Kill For
Submitted by ★ epsilon
70.51%
7 ref
6.33 ref
8
~26.17 ref
Unique A Hat to Kill For
55 votes up
23 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions
Rabbit Bot🎨PAINTED HATS 7/24
100%
16.55–21.66 ref
23.22–29.11 ref
JayTuut
100%
14.88–25.66 ref
16.55–21.66 ref
...
96.3%
11.77–12 ref
14.88–25.66 ref

This suggestion was accepted by A Delicious Cashew™.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

First suggestion, please comment on how to improve these for the future.


Classifieds

Selling: http://i.imgur.com/ed5cLm9.png

Buying: http://i.imgur.com/g4dooZJ.png


TF2Outpost

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27733502 - 6.66 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27732709 - 6.66 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27737680 - 4.77 ref


Scrap.TF

http://i.imgur.com/ynO1FY5.png - Bots are selling @ 6.66 refined each


Unsolds

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27727549 - 7 ref (2 days)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27731125 - 8 ref (1 day)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27727457 - 8 ref (2 days)


Many people on Outpost are selling/buying at "backpack.tf price" but don't specify anything else, whether it be high or low end or otherwise.


SCM supports this drop - http://i.imgur.com/LvG1oeE.png

★ epsilon · posted

    Lovely lovely~


    Nice for a first suggestion. Your 4.77 ref seller is adding 33% paint price, hence he'd add around ~3 ref to that price. Around 7.77?


    Also, you might want to fix the bold quote.


    "Many sellers on Outpost are BUYING (?) at "backpack.tf price"" Don't you mean selling?


    Overall, nice suggestion, UP-Vray.


    -Tama-

    Avatar ★ Siewierszczyzna · posted

      Thanks for your help, fixed those. Sorry about the painted one, it was a little unclear at first glance.

      ★ epsilon · posted

        Nice~ (Might want to add bump-levels on outpost listings?)


        I organize them into

        Well-Bumped

        Meh-Bumped

        Horribly Bumped.


        Works for me, you can make your own one.

        Avatar ★ Siewierszczyzna · posted

          Oh, I was going according to price. Fixed!

          ★ epsilon · posted

            Lovely~


            Now just wait for it to be accepted.

            Avatar ★ Siewierszczyzna · posted

    Your proof for 6.33 ref is young, but with SCM at ~5.7 ref, I guess it's good if it goes a day without being bought.

    Unsolds at higher than the current price don't add anything to the suggestion. I have no problem it with personally, it just takes up space.

    Just pointing to everyone else that 4.77 ref is countered by the fact it's young and the multitude of buyers at 5-5.66 ref.

    Not sure if scrap.tf can be used as proof, though.


    A few problems with this suggestion, but it's otherwise fine as long as the 6.33 ref seller doesn't sell. Good first suggestion. Upvote.


    Avatar ★ Discovery · posted

      Thanks for your comment, I'll remember all this for my next suggestion.

      ★ epsilon · posted