Price Suggestion
~10.1 keys
Unique Baphomet Trotters
56 votes up
75 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by A Delicious Cashew™.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

1. you only raise prices with : buyers , maybe solds -> Edit: sellers are ONLY valid for raise if there is acurrent buyer who pays more than current value = " no seller below"


2. You have to post screens of classies if u wanna use it as proof


3. = @ this time , this suggestion is not valid.

    yes you can use sales to raise :P it's not a maybe


    @suggester

    the 8key one is glitched (?) not valid, take it out


    edit: I see your edit, and that's not correct at all. you can never use sellers to raise. lack of sellers at current/below suggested price is good support though, but lack of sellers =/= sellers :|

      nope. ONLY if there is a buyer at a higher praise and no seller below = proofing with sellers that there is no seller below the currenty higher buyer .


      In general: Buyers =to raise // Sellers = to lower


      Also, this suggestion is NOT VALID if u don't put in screens of the buyers !

        you can't be serious, sales can be used to raise a price.... you don't need any buyer ads....


        I'm also not disagreeing that the suggester should have a screenshot of the buyer

          Ignoring the fact that i stated that this suggestion is not valid , nice ! :)

          Sellers will always try to sell for more. It can be a hint that there should be a raise, if no one want to buy a hat for 1 key , it means nothing if 100 ppl try to sell for 1 key

          read http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/792-how-to-make-a-good-suggestion-bullet-points-version/ before you want to argue

            what? sales =/= sellers. you can use SALES to raise. you can't use SELLERS to raise


            edit: I wasn't talking about sellers in my first reply before my edit


            http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/36705-guide-for-non-unusual-suggestions/ this guide is the most recent one

              never said something different. Again this suggestion is NOT valid = no screens

                "yes you can use sales to raise :P it's not a maybe" -> me

                "nope" -> you

                you disagreed with me saying sales are used to raise a price...


                "I'm also not disagreeing that the suggester should have a screenshot of the buyer" -> me several minutes ago


                  bsides a misunderstanding => This suggestion is NOT valid => no screens... why do you run away from refering to this? Strange behavior for an orange belt!!

                    I've already referred to the screenshot thing twice....

                That's exactly what Beef is saying, though...?


                There's a serious misunderstanding going on here.

                  started with ". you only raise prices with : buyers , maybe solds " (beef). tried to confirm that yes, solds (or as I say, sales) can be used to raise a price. he disagreed, now we're here. I think it all went wrong when I didn't use "solds" in my first reply


                  and triple comment glitch


                  @your screenshot comment above, I'm not about to do the suggester's work/suggestion fixing for them

                    If I can understand what Beef is saying, he is saying that you can raise using sellers if there are no sellers below the highest buyer, which is essentially raising using BUYERS not SELLERS.


                    In other words, Beef is saying you can't use sellers to raise a price, only buyers (and solds if available), which is exactly what you are saying.

                    I think he might have misread your "Yes, SALES can be used to raise" as "Yes, SELLERS can be used to raise" and naturally disagreed with you. Then he kept it up for a good 3 comments.


                    Edit: Well, if you're not going to contribute to the suggestion, don't argue over a silly misunderstanding.

          First

          @StingerRPG I already stated it was an outlier for the 8 keys, hence not including it in the price.

          @Juicy Beef I don't get it... why do no screenshots = not valid?

            This not a vaild version, its not exactly an outlier, it should never be called as an outlier in the first place.

              So you want me to include the 8 keys in the price suggestion

                nah he means that the 8key seller isn't valid, so it shouldn't even be called an outlier

              the classifieds can change and they leave no record of the ad existing behind. a screenshot persists and gives us a moment in time we can refer back to

              screenshot the buyer

                knavesmith posted a screenshot two hours before your comment

                  no idea why you haven't done it yourself. I hope will learn from your fault for the next time !!!!!


                  upvoted , because NOW it is valid