Suggestion: The Festive Holy Mackerel at 3 ref

Price Suggestion

~29 ref

126 votes up

19 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Fri, 05 Feb 16 16:42:43 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

It appears these festives needs a drop of some sort...shame. I like them.

3 ref

http://puu.sh/mPR0z/49cb29fc30.png 2x at ref in classified, advertised in Outpost as well.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27450523 - 2.88 12x in stock.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27760472 - 4 days, 3 days unbumped

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27157253 - 3 month old trade

3.33 unsolds

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27769358 - 2 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27761554 - 4 days, 2 days unbumped

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27729033 - 1 week

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27739424 - "bp.tf price" 1 week

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27579126 - 1 month old trade

2.66 buyers

http://puu.sh/mPR4r/4870e98483.png - 2 buy orders at classifieds, one advertised in outpost.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27681873

With all these unsolds at 3 ref, but with available buyers at 2.66 ref, 3 ref seems to be the correct range.

Feel free to counter / support my proof. Vote based on proof presented, not blindly!

Dear god, He has returned and gone mad with suggestions.

Have you checked the SCM?

it seems it could support a raise to 4.66 or I could be wrong (not a genie)

I do not think SCM can be used as primary proof, whatnot with taxes into the equation and all. If the market demand is low for 3 ref, I doubt 4.66 would be an optimal raise at all.

True. However this - http://backpack.tf/vote/id/56ad3c96b98d88ff038d78e9

Yes, I saw that. The difference however is that you're raising the value with the market demanding it, whereas mine is quite the opposite. Who knows though, mods should know better from me when I literally came back from a 2-year hiatus just today lmao.

Yea, I know. This looks ok.

SCM has changed to being a good source thanks to escrow

hi unknown person

Don't think your outpost sellers at 3 ref are valid :p

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27450523 selling at 2.88, he sold 11.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27760472 3 days unbumped like u said

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27157253 sold, dont know when though.

and your 3.33 seller

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27739424 if its for "bp.tf prices" dont think you should use that for prices like 3-3.33, cause it could mean 3 or 3.33.

~~welcome back btw~~

All which still supports my suggestion for 3 ref. While some of my proofs aren't very strong, it doesn't hurt listing them. I don't see this warranting a close at this time.

Also hi another black belt, so many now hue.

Oh, I never said to close the suggestion, was just pointing out some mistakes :p

And hey, heard you were a legend from others xD

Unsure as to why this suggestion isn't accepted by now, but my all of my 3.33 unsolds still remain, except for the first link which was closed but did not sell. All of my 3 ref sellers remain as well.

If the issue pertains to SCM, I do not understand this rationale. While this may be more relevant to items more than 1 key, I fail to see its huge significance when selling only 1 does not give back a key. Sure currently it's ~3.44, but only through strenuous means that requires a lot of supply from the trader in comparison to the convenience to the non-SCM market.

Oh, hi there! Welcome back! To answer your question, we had a lot of suggestions last weekend, and this probably slipped through the cracks.