- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
*fixing Sale 1*
This is Hot.
http://backpack.tf/item/261479088
Sale 1) Sold for 224 Keys + a Strange Professional Killstreak Frying Pan (~14 Keys) = 238 Keys
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198043936328?time=1454054400
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198043936328?time=1454140800
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27688825 - Capped by B/O of 220 Keys
Sale 2) Quicksold for 180 Keys
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198043457018?time=1454659200
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198043457018?time=1454745600
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27790004 - Seller's Trade
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27808094 - Buyer's Trade
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sale 3) Sold for 180 Keys
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27676007
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27630123 - Original Trade
Took 23 Days.
I don't see why sale 3 isn't an outlier, he didn't list 180 on any of his trades so it technically wasn't unsold at 180 for 3 weeks, it was unsold at 200 however.
there's also a decline offer of 180 pure here: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27474111
unsold at 200 for 9 months here: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25717810
The person who offered 180 bought the Mancer's in Sale 2.
What we have here is a blatant attempt to manipulate prices. This all started with the attempt to continue lowering the value of the Scorching Flames Danger. It came to my attention because my deal was being used as the "proof" for the suggestion. Looking at my trade history I could see that items were missed and that other elements of the trade were misunderstood.
I pointed this out and commented that instead of lowering the price of the Danger he should raise the value of the Scorching Pyromancer. Lo and behold this peon of objectivity makes a new suggestion raising the Pyromancer.
Here is this individual attempting to make me happy by raising the price of the other hat; of which I have one.. comment quote.
"I suggested the Pyromancer's at 215. Is that better for you :P"
What is very disturbing is; These suggestions are not based on any facts (the facts are wrong). It is an obvious attempt to lower that value of a certain hat; and is compounded by making another suggestion to raise the value of a hat, not because it should be raised but to compensate someone for the decrease of another hat; "making it better for me".
Disgraceful.
This is not a manipulation of prices, as I already told you. I priced the Danger with the Pyromancer's, given the Danger is about to become Outdated. Sure, the Pyromancer's could have been more than the 197.5 I had in my first suggestion; thus I did research and found facts to support its price. If my facts are wrong, prove it. I've already asked you if you could supply a screenshot of your sale if I was wrong, so that I may fix it. Yet you sit here whining and providing no facts to counter my evidence. Quite frankly, what you said about the C.A.P.P.E.R being used to send the trade to Escrow makes no sense at all. Unless you can support that the C.A.P.P.E.R was not involved, I'm inclined to re-include it in the Danger sale.
Your repetitious efforts to try and correct my suggestions, with no factual evidence, which happen to increase the prices on said suggestions seem to imply that YOU are trying to manipulate the price.
So, I'll ask you again. Supply a screenshot with evidence, if you can, or else the facts that we can see, which I have listed, are the facts that will be used in this suggestion and the one for the Danger. I have no further desire to argue with you.
Well pure sales here, nothing wrong. 3 B/Os around 220 keys ( http://puu.sh/nqQwy/076043de63.png ) which make higher sales outliers (looking at the Danger sale if we use the 3 months old price). If you have an issue with the sale being used for the Danger I guess post it there because the Mancer suggestion itself is perfectly fine.