Suggestion: Stare from Beyond Executioner at 95–145 keys

Price Suggestion

~427.5 keys

stare

83 votes up

14 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Mon, 04 Apr 16 17:21:40 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Counter

Sale #1

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198184906902/#!/compare/1457164800/1457251200

Sold with Max (30) + Bubbling Casemaker (20.5) for Searing HKC (137.5) + ~8 keys sweets

145.5 – (30+20.5) = 95

Sale #2

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198040280241/#!/compare/1457596800/1457683200

https://ctrlv.cz/BuM3 - credits to |DR:3| Nathan for the screenshot

Sold for Scorching Stetson (190) + 6 keys

190 + 6 = 196

Sale #3

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561197994933458/#!/compare/1455782400/1456041600

Quicksold for 85 keys

Sale #4

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198059797730/#!/compare/1457683200/1457769600

Sold for DP VVF (90) + Terror-Watt Exe (52) + 2 keys

90+52+2 = 144 rounding to 145

Minis

Bubbling Casemaker

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198115435226/#!/compare/1454659200/1454745600

Sold for C9 Billycock (20.5)

Scorching Stetson

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198119666999/#!/compare/1457683200/1457769600

Sold alongside WW Cool Brain Candy RL (30) for RA Samur-Eye (220)

220-30 = 190

Micro for RL - http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198102805459/#!/compare/1457251200/1457683200

Sold for Max (30)

DP VVF

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198085269574/#!/compare/1457596800/1457856000

Sold with Aces BB (34.5) + 2 keys for Beams Swagmans (101.5) + RA Stovepipe (36)

(101.5+36) – (34.5+2) = 101

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27941837 - B/O of 90

Terror-Watt Exe

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561197993383111/#!/compare/1457337600/1457424000

Sold for Scorching Raincatcher (54)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27664090 - B/O of 52

Sales at 85, 95, 145 and ~~196~~

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27565185 - seller at 150 for ~2 months with no luck

Calling 196 and 85 outliers

Your "seller with no luck" is the wrong link :P

Oops, little bit of self-promotion xD I'll go find it

The HKC is outdated.

No it's not, it was priced a month ago

Check the sales and everything.

The price is in date, it is ok to be used for this suggestion

The sales are not what determines an item's validity when it comes to its price. The pricing of an item is considered current if it's most recent price suggestion was accepted within the past 2-3 months.

As I've already suggested, you REALLY need to read the rules on how pricing works. PLEASE heed this advice.

http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-guide-for-unusual-price-suggestions/

And here's yet another sale involving the Executioner, where the Executioner and a Sunbeams Stainless Pot (125) were traded for a Screaming Tiger Buy a Life Taunt (75), a Sulphurous Hat of Cards (65), and a Phosphorous Party Phantom (120), bringing the total deal to 260, meaning that the Executioner was priced at 135.

Before: https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198184906902?time=1453017600

After: https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198184906902?time=1453190400

Thank you, that fits nicely in the range :)

Any time! ^-^

Dude, I did this trade, I got offers at over 230 in unsuuals for the cone, this is not right at all. If you look at the offers on the HKC you see it's worth alot more, I also sold the Execute for a scorching Stetson. wich is like around 200, this is just straight up stupid, wow. Learn to look at offers before pricing items

You can always create a suggestion to change the HKC's price if you believe it is wrong, instead of complaining and being rude.

By the time the HKC gets priced, the Executioner will already be priced wrong.

I don't mean to be rude, and I'm sorry for that. But I get mad when you go off unreal low backpack prices. You should have made a Mini on the cone before jumping to backpack prices

Mini isn't needed, as the price is up to date. Like I said, if you don't agree you're more than welcome to create a new suggestion.

I know you all want to make profit and grow your bp value, but the sale data is there.

I don't care about my backpack value, either way, I downvote this sugestion. I have no reason to be rude and argue anymore about this. Good luck, but I stongly disagree in this sugestion either way.

There was a seller at 150 keys for 2 months with no luck selling. This shows for a start that the stetson sale is an outlier. 2 sales at 95 and 145 are reasonable and are shown to be the most common selling point

If you didn't get it, it was quicksold at 95 pure

Why do you think it was a quicksale?

That's what I have heard from the guy I bought it for, I aslo got told that AFTER I got the hat. I have no proof. But isn't it weird that I got 150-200 key offers on it? If it has sold for 95 in the past?

http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-guide-for-unusual-price-suggestions/

Please read. If you feel prices are incorrect, you are free to submit tangible proof to support your claims and have items repriced. If you cannot supply proof, then your claims are baseless.

Your sale, as you can see here, classifies as an outlier. Sorry you paid so much, but when compared to the other purchases that have happened in the past few months, your buyer overpaid. The base price of a hat is not immediately set at the highest amount paid, but the average of the sales that have been reported. Yours is the extreme high end of the spectrum, thus is an outlier.

Found a sale for 120 pure. Fits nicely right in the middle of your range.

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198028307864/#!/compare/1457683200/1457769600

Thank you :)

I would not use that searing cone sale here at all actually; perhaps that could be used to update that searing cone sometime soon (its probably low currently, judging by offers: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27854854 )

Other sales:

Ghosts mancer ~145

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198120366659/#!/compare/1459036800/1459641600

Sold + other stuff for frostbite muffs

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198108063138/#!/compare/1458950400/1459036800

thats a year outdated, could be updated but I feel this'd be low there

Sold for what I assume would be 200 in hats

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198120147285/#!/compare/1458864000/1458950400

that waxy need an update BADLY. Didnt check the other smaller hats. Bonzo thing is ~3m old

Your sale 2 was actually ~110 pure:

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198028307864/#!/compare/1457683200/1457769600

He probably quickbought those other two hats with the pure afterwards. Histories on those two hats dont match. The dude that sold it for that

This would put the actual sales at

~85 [pure, qs]

~95 (wouldnt use that sale at all here)

~110 [pure, inactive seller]

~145

~190

~200 [estimate]

And theres the frostbite muffs sale which I presume would be around the highest two sales.

really tricky one; sales all over the place. That unsold buyout is quite a while ago now, but still definitely makes the high sales look outliery here. However, since theres so many high sales, I feel like 95-145 or even 110-145 would be undervaluing this.

Not that I care anymore, but I valued those hats at 235 keys and so did the seller and I have proof taht I sold them and selling them for that much. Check my Outpost.

200 was an esimate; main point there is that the sale is higher than the suggested range. This is very likely too low.

Ill look into that waxy and request an update on it