Suggestion: Overclocked Tavish DeGroot Experience at 15–19 keys

Price Suggestion

~30 keys

overclocked

71 votes up

9 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed automatically because another price suggestion was accepted instead.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Dank tanner memes

Sale 1:

Sold for a Stormy Storm Conquistador

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198085691904?time=1457078400

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198085691904?time=1457243087

Outside of the hat being outdated, this sale seems really low. Not using to price this.

Sale 2:

Sold on SCM for $52.9 ~21 keys

x.85 = 44.95 ~17 keys

~19 keys mean, using 19.

http://puu.sh/nR8kV.png

http://puu.sh/nR8we.png - what the seller got

http://puu.sh/nR91W.png - what the buyer paid

Leaving the first image as is as to not raise any suspicions.

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198043798397 Current owner of the hat. Judging by when the hat is tradable, I'm pretty sure that this is the sale that happened.

Sale 3:

Sold for 15 keys. History's really spotty on the seller's side, but I'm damn sure it sold for that.

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198051040057?time=1456926271

http://backpack.tf/item/1664417061 History of reference.

Gonna use 15 - 19 here.

Eh, it does not really matter whether you stretch the scm sale to one with a range or take the average, thats up to the suggesters discretion. This suggestion is a counter with a difference based on a rounding opinion.

Similar situation:

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/55bbee99b98d88cf618b456f

Imo 15-21 seems far too big. This range seems a lot nicer, but shouldn't a range be made out of the two ends of the sale? Like the buyer paid 21, and the seller received 19, so that'd make 20? 15-20?

So you're going to ignore the other sale of 15 keys?

That wasn't another sale, it was the other end of the already mentioned 15 key sale.

Oh, actually you caught a mistake I didnt even realize was there because I didnt calc anything yet.

Somewhere in the calculations Tanner or Oddball goes wrong here, since the buyer indeed paid 21 but the seller received 19, instead of the 17 stated in the suggestion. The average would indeed be 20.

Tbh that saves me the trouble of deciding here. In this case, taking avg and taking high end is both okay, but taking low end is the only option thats objectively wrong here :P

You stole Tanner's suggestion for once, nice mem.