Suggestion: The Ooze Sole Mate at 112 keys

Price Suggestion

The Ooze Sole Mate

Submitted Thu, 14 Apr 16 14:35:16 +0000 by ★ pancakington

62.92%

n/a

112 keys

~177 keys

ooze

56 votes up

33 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Fri, 06 May 16 02:53:24 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Sold for a Darkblaze Flamenco and 2 Tinge paints.

Flamenco is still sitting at a valid 110, and a key each for the paints.

https://gyazo.com/b03f0b3898ca017efb6a83aff68c62a5

http://puu.sh/oh5eq/122a7ce894.png

http://puu.sh/oh5eG/e91e8dd4aa.png

other sale of the Ooze is invalid. This is the only usable sale.

u need more than 1 to price an unpriced hat when there are other recent ones. also there is one listed on outpost for sale. Why are you saying the other sale is invalid? there are more recent sales here ; http://backpack.tf/item/4303131678

if you would actually make the effort to check those "sales" you would know that they aren't sales, they were a transfer to a broker.

Now now, there's no need to be condescending. >.>

there is a sale for about ~45 keys and your sale. you need a 3rd sale to determine the outlier or time to pass to see if it goes unsold on outpost. wow, were u actually getting salty with me for pointing out there was another sale?

stating that you need to learn to actually check something before you make false claims isn't "being salty" it's called friendly advice.

http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-new-unusual-price-suggestion-guide-the-cheat-sheet/

friendly advice, read the part about pricing unpriced unusuals

there have been several instances where 1:1 unusuals have been priced with just one valid sale, so.

They can be priced with only one sale if it's not for sale anymore.

You'll have to wait 1 month to price this or wait until it sells again.

And in those instances, there were no other sales and the hat wasn't for resale.

Please heed Storms' advice and read the rules before posting another suggestion.

There's been three sales on this hat in the past month. I think it needs a range and not a single set price.

First Sale: Sold for a G.E. Nanobalaclava and ~3 Keys Sweets = ~45 Keys

Before: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198136390646?time=1457856000

After: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198136390646?time=1457938800

Second Sale: Can't seem to track it, but you were the one who sold the hat. You can easily find it in your inventory history and report it here.

Third Sale: The sale being reported.

It seems to me like there is a consistent range of value on the hat, then an extremely high one that recently just happened, and all of this was done in the past month. Something tells me the Flamenco sale may be an outlier. I will wait until you find your sale of the hat and report it to make a conclusive decision.

EDIT: Current owner has the hat for sale, with a buyout of 120 keys. This will have to wait at LEAST a month before it can be priced by this single sale anyways, so you've got some time. ^-^

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/28069595

like i just said, the "2nd sale" isn't a sale, it's a transfer to the person who brokered the hat.

That still leaves a valid sale for 45 within the month. And the hat is up for resale.

I think we're being hasty trying to reprice this so high. It's probably best to wait for another sale.

it was stated in the last suggestion that that sale was an outlier and was invalid, so i scratched it.

Stated by whom exactly? The random person in the comments who isn't a pricing mod? How exactly can a sale be an outlier, when at the time, it was the only sale on record for the hat?

because it was obviously an extremely low price for the hat and effect. Now look who is being condescending.

Please don't confuse disagreement with condescension. Why the need to lash out whenever someone presents data that contradicts your own? Someone commenting "It's an outlier" in the comments section of a suggestion probably isn't a refutable source if it isn't a pricing moderator, especially if they erroneously make the claim when it's the only sale on record for the hat.

Regardless of whether the perceived price of a hat is low, hats here are priced based on actual sales. As we only have two tangible sales on record, we have to establish a range, but because of the two polar differences in price, we need a third sale to eliminate the outlier.

You CAN'T price based on a single sale because there is more than one sale in recent history. AND the current owner is attempting to resell the hat, which is in direct conflict with the pricing rules.

Chillax honey. No need to be so hostile when others are trying to help you NOT get dinged for a bad suggestion. Not sure if you are aware of it, but any time you have a suggestion closed by a moderator, it goes against you negatively.

I remember when I sold the hat. Wasn't easy process. :)

Jeez, what's all the rudeness about?

Like the other guys said, we can't just have a 45-112 range, and there HAS been other sales, just not able to be tracked down. We need a third sale to determine the outlier, or just wait until that third sale happens. Though with it being a 1/1 it'll take a while.

Edit: how long have you had it previously? Can't we track a sale from there?

The exchange between OP and the other owner was a transfer to a broker. It wasn't a sale.

Either way, since it is up for resale, we will have to wait to see what it sells for before we can eliminate one of the sales as an outlier.

Ah thanks for the clarification.

Well I dunno. We'll still have to wait for another sale.

Yup. Can't establish a range and eliminate an outlier until that happens.

Downvote:

New sale:

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198136390646#!/compare/1457856000/1457938800 ~45 (creds scootaloo)

I'd wait for another sale.