Suggestion: The Bruiser's Bandanna at 16 ref

Price Suggestion

The Bruiser's Bandanna

Submitted Tue, 17 May 16 12:40:11 +0000 by ★ zewok

63.17%

17 ref

16 ref

~8.16 ref

964 votes up

562 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Tue, 31 May 16 21:15:05 +0000 by polar.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

All users in this site selling this cosmetic for 16 ref

http://m.imgur.com/gallery/Wd7JQD1

backpack.tf/rules

Ugly proof, no sales, 3 buyers @16.

You can't change a price with sellers only.

Downvote.

You can lower a price with sellers, actually. However, 16 ref does seem a bit too low here.

Sellers help, but not only sellers. He needs sales.

There are buyers @16 anyways, if they lower their buying price, a suggestion to lower it could work imo.

Edit:

R+ubi bought a pair of those.

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198002757046#!/compare/1463356800/1463443200

No, he doesn't 'need' sales, sellers are fine for an item drop. If there are a bunch of sellers selling for less than an item's current price, then the current price is no longer a common trading point, and therefore needs to be dropped. Sales are only 'needed' when raising the price of an item, to prove that it can sell for more than the current price.

Examples of using sellers to drop a price:

http://backpack.tf/suggestion/5738ee8086674721c25a480e

http://backpack.tf/suggestion/5738f256c4404501531538a5

http://backpack.tf/suggestion/5738f2a0866747750624697d

These are 3 random suggestions that i clicked on at the "recently accepted" section of the front page.

I don't know what you're talking about, you don't need sales to drop an item.

Looks like it's not too low anymore. 10 in classifieds at 16 ref, 4 in between 16 and 17 ref, and 15 at 17 ref. No buyers at 16 ref, the only buyer at 16 ref now fully stocked in just a few hours. Gonna upvote here.

7 of those classifieds at 16 quicksold. 16 is definitely low..

True. Going back to neutral here, seems like a range is in order.

no pleaze this is good hat it should have a price for 17 REFs or more

Please tell me you're joking.

ye its a joke

I thought so.

The reason?

When I was walking back and tracking this thread, I noticed that someone dropped this:

I thought it was yours.

Even then, you should not really make jokes here.

but still buyers for 16 counter this suggestion

Not anymore.

https://gyazo.com/132b473a81ce2188aa3c88b54e440e4e ***

Read my comment above. Fully stocked in a few hours.

R.I.P. Most stable item in tf2 ever 2013-2016

Upvote

Ahaha so u want to make the price unstable and no proof?? Lol downvote

He's/she's not making the price unstable by voting up a suggestion. Technically the item is already unstable, but price suggestions are used to show that it is, it doesn't influence instability.

This suggestion beeds more proof to do this close this trade before admins close it

Where did you get air from?

I find it quite ironic that you actually don't have a bandanna yourself

How exactly is this bad proof? Sure, it may not be much but it is still valid and acceptable. If enough people are willing to sell this for 16 ref, then it should be 16 ref. I'm upvoting this. Seems good

Btw i sold my banada a week ago for a key i think last month and btw i have banada before

Here I am to save the day and get warned by a mod.

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198150224626#!/compare/1460937600/1461024000 Shows that you did indeed own a bandanna and you did trade it to someone else. However the backpack of the buyer (http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198086288446#!/compare/1460592000/1461110400) Does not show that he had a key removed from his inventory. In fact, the items that you received and the items that the buyer lost have no correlation at all. So in comes the question. Did you sell the item at all, or did you give it away? Even if you do have proof that you did indeed sell the item for 1 key, it's too late, one month too late. That trade is old news.

Do a backpack comparison

I agree i think it should be 16 ref

buyer at 16 now

So counter?

Yea, buyers counter, especially auto-buying ones. Buyers are actually the reason my s. degreaser suggestion was rejected. I wasn't able to lower it enough (below the 5% rule) for it to be valued.

2 of the listings are from the same person, so you lose a piece of proof there, as that's technically one listing. You really need more proof tbh.

8 sellers at 16 ref (some with free paint): http://imgur.com/FVNZOkA

Definitely needs a drop, already upvoted. Just some extra proof

Buyers at 16 counter. -1

Only one buyer at 16? I don't think that's enough to counter 8 sellers. If 4 or so people were buying at 16, sure, but one isn't enough

Not even one valid buyer in the classies anymore.

I recently sold the bandana and 1.22 for a key. Can provice a screen if wanted. Idk if it helps, but wanted to mention it

Just sold mine for 17 ref (with a 16.33 ref B/O):

http://puu.sh/p4Bnt/260f600c84.png

So the conclusion is: ?

...that this item can still sell for more than 16 ref, so 16 ref flat isn't an ideal price here. Didn't think it needed explaining.

It didn't it was just a straight forward answer to close the suggestion.

Upvote, no more buyer at 17 & 16 majority of sellers stand at 16. Upvote for now, only thing to do now is to wait

RIP bandanna, I sold all of them before it decrease in price

They all seam to be crafted hats, and we all know we rather a dropped hat or hat that was bought. It would explain why they are either selling them at a lower price or buying them for a lower price then the currently set price for said item.

Several buyers for 15.66 but a lot of people selling for 16.88~17, only one for 16 on bp.tf right now.

edit: Oh never mind, the seller at 16 asks for overpay only :/

soooo? yes or no?

http://i.imgur.com/9cE0wE7.png 17 ref

All of them sold and one of the sellers (who frequently restocks) actually raised their price to 16.33. Going to need some unsolds at 17 ref to remove it from the range. Something like 16-17 might be better