Suggestion: Strange Jag at 8.33 ref

Price Suggestion

Strange Jag

Submitted Sat, 04 Jun 16 06:34:44 +0000 by Blaze.xTH3RM4Lx

91.67%

8.44 ref

8.33 ref

~1.88 keys

44 votes up

4 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Sat, 04 Jun 16 16:25:30 +0000 by A Delicious Cashew™.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Classifieds:

http://i.imgur.com/nGnsowL.png

- Sellers: (1 at 8 ref, 1 at 8.22, 3 at 8.33, 1 at 8.44)

5% rule and unnecessary change.

8.33 seems much more reasonable than 8.44

Tried that before:

http://backpack.tf/suggestion/574809b6c4404576ca569d0e

http://backpack.tf/suggestion/5748534e866747758979fb6d

http://backpack.tf/suggestion/574995a2c440454c9452d7f7

http://backpack.tf/suggestion/5749957986674755c46afde9

http://backpack.tf/suggestion/573ff4bf8667476a920e8ce8

http://backpack.tf/suggestion/57498d61c440452054453704

i don't get this rule

Backpack expanders are excluded from the rule and I think removing a range is also fine, but I don't understand the Demo's Fro one..

i'll wait for a mod's advice for now

If you wanna hear my opinion I doubt that a 1 scrap change for an item of this price will pass, but feel free to leave this open, maybe mods will be able to shed some more light on this.

Read what the other mods said on your suggestion. The rise was closed because it was obvious a more meaningful change was required. The drop was closed because it was obvious it was going to need a bigger drop in a day

For the ones blaze posted, I don't have an issue with any of them either. An one ref change on a key item can be the difference between selling it easily and not selling at all. It's the same idea with an one rec change.

Again, this is really situation dependent, I don't have an issue with this suggestion either, seeing how there's more valid sellers at 8.33 (1) than valid sellers at 8.44 (0) on classifieds