- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
1 year, 3 months ago, this was updated last
Proof:
Only sold (this hat is 1 of 1 so not surprising):
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198131569943#!/compare/1464307200/1464393600 ~sold with a gbh slouch ~70 for a phosphorous tough muffs ~115(pending sugg)
115 - 70 = 45
"Basically, if a hat is a small piece in a large deal, that sale should not be used as proof."
So you're stating that this deal was "large"?
I'm stating the hat was a small piece of a larger deal.
Also this being the only sale is a flat-out lie.
http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561197987183850#!/compare/1464220800/1464393600
Sold for Duped PE Cosa. Should be priced using this sale and not that one.
I wouldn't call this a large deal at all. Maybe as you're second statement says "a larger deal". But not large. Right, I assume this wont pass and he'll need to resuggest, then it'll be an downvote from my end.
I don't get how this is a large deal but everyone favours Gent :P
What Gent's saying is that the hat in question didn't play a significant part in the deal and is, therefore, more than likely to not properly represent an accurate value of the hat.
It was 2 hats for 1 man, not like it's a bulk deal
It doesn't have to be a bulk deal for Bob's explanation to be entirely accurate.