Suggestion: Circling Peace Sign Hong Kong Cone at 160–215 keys

Price Suggestion

~60 keys

peace

60 votes up

21 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Fri, 09 Sep 16 19:14:10 +0000 by Vijf Kilo Boter (met voetjes).

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Counter

Sale 1 -

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198005689389#!/compare/1469318400/1469404800

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/28356621 - b/o 220

Sold for a beams company man (215)

Mini on man:

https://backpack.tf/suggestion/57a336f486674771b036e202 - 215

Sale 2 -

https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198005689389#!/compare/1469491200/1471305600

Sold with ~18 for a demonflare company man

180 - 18 = 162

Mini for the Company Man -

http://backpack.tf/suggestion/57b37c228667470bfe63c751

180

Rounding 162 to 160 giving the hat a range of 160-215

demoflame company man was itself outdated imo .... its more rare then sunbeam

http://backpack.tf/classifieds?item=Company%20Man&quality=5&tradable=1&craftable=1&australium=-1&particle=17

seller @ 210 on the beams company. -

2 weeks unsold @ 210 - http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/28384760

this should be close enough so no real point in re-suggesting for such a small difference

Your mini on the DF Man is off. The suggester didn't post a mini on the smoking viewfinder, so both this and that are off a bit.

Um what...? 3 months is still considered as valid proof as long as it doesn't go into 4+ months. Again, how are you even black belt?

http://prntscr.com/c6yh40

Those pictures aren't updated everyday. Here's a quote from the unusual guide - http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-guide-for-unusual-price-suggestions/

"Hats with an outdated price (>3 months old) are not valid proof. Again, please include links for outdated hats in your suggestion as supplemental proof. Just don't rely on them to set your range."

Also, even if you don't agree, the suggester for the demonflame cap resuggested, so you'll have to resuggest as well

">3 months old", meaning all sales that occured later than 3 months ago. However not including 3 months, otherwise it would say ≥3 months, rather than just >3 months

He resuggested at the same value, and that value is okay, so it wont be an issue here :P