- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Proof: http://imgur.com/a/icQXT
The three sellers are young/inactive and there's a bumped buyer @ 1.33
I think 1.44 would work better.
I'm the buyer at 1.33 ref and if you'd check my backpack you'd see how easy it is to buy one for 1.33 ref.
How are the three sellers inactive when they have bp.tf automatic?
Would also like to add that scrap.tf is selling 2 at 1.22 ref each at the moment if anyone is interested: https://scrap.tf/hats/8
That just proves that 1.33 is too low.
1.44 would be better indeed.
How does that prove 1.33 to be low? If a large amount of sales happens at a price then that price is the most common trading point. Common sense needs to be used here.
This should be fine, upvote.
Either invalid/young should go 1.44 flat
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/28428486 hasn't sold at 1.33 is fine
1.33 is better than 1.44 here
1.33-1.44 is better as that 1.33 unsold is pretty much valid same as 1.44>
Where is your proof for sales at 1.44 ref?
i mean by 1.44 have a lot of valid sellers
Sellers doesn't necessarily mean sales. You need sales at 1.44 ref to justify a range of 1.33-1.44 ref.
your bot counters the 1.33 sellers.
http://imgur.com/a/BbMhe
http://imgur.com/a/FqlWN - 1.22 ref
I'd say that that sale is an outlier, I think OP proved that it is quite easy to buy these @1.33, and sales below and above backpack.tf price always happen.
it says you own 107 of them @_@