Suggestion: Strange Silver Botkiller Scattergun Mk.II at 7.66 ref

Price Suggestion

~3.5 ref

378 votes up

208 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Tue, 11 Oct 16 23:41:47 +0000 by Mindacos.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Sales at 7.66:

http://imgur.com/a/NawJ9

Sales can be used off SCM if really needed Upvote =)

A single sale =/= "Sales"

is this comment necessary?

i've always used this format as I list all the sales I can find, in this case i only have 1 sale but i'm still listing, i.e. http://backpack.tf/suggestion/57e5b5e58667475c5a4a7f5b

Yes, it is misleading.

how is it misleading? i posted 1 link which is obviously 1 sale. it's not like i put 20 of the same pictures claiming it was 20 sales

at this point it seems like you're just spamming for no reason

not my fault if people don't bother clicking links. i've used this format for the past 3 years.. and no one has complained about it until you for some reason despite me doing this for so long now and haven't complained about it before

lol you definitely saw this suggestion just 18 days ago and were perfectly fine with it then: http://backpack.tf/suggestion/57d965b6c440455a933abad1

A single imgur link can contain a lot of images.

I don't think you quite understand what spamming means.

I did think about bringing up the wrong labeling of a single sale as "Sales" back then but decided not to.

Is it that hard to just label your proof correctly?

I think this needs Some more sales to raise the price

past suggestion based off a single sale and less than a page on outpost and majority are killstreaks.

scm supports the raise and no sellers at 7.33 as well, this is fine

If you say so

Is removing range cant be applied with 5% change?

i don't see why not, look at the previous accepted suggestion

Im just asking but okay ;p

I like how it says "sales" but only one sale made.

not going to repeat myself, refer to the comment i made to salvage

You name thief!

1 sale is not usually enough evidence

check the previous accepted suggestion

lots are being listed for 7 ref ... if anything needs a decrease not an increase

young and unbumped and buyers counter

The 3 days unbumped 7 refs seller on the classifieds does not count. There are 3 buyers at 7.33, and the lowest sellers after that are at 8.33. SCM would support a much, much bigger raise than that. This suggestion will pass.

When you have to justify your purchase .-.

http://backpack.tf/item/4958081505 - i purchased this 3 months ago

"Sales"

1 valid proof

Has one in inventory

Seems legit...

wow i never noticed any comment like this in this suggestion yet, thanks for the new information! /s

i've already explained everything you have just commented above if you even bothered checking.

"is this comment necessary?

i've always used this format as I list all the sales I can find, in this case i only have 1 sale but i'm still listing, i.e. http://backpack.tf/suggestion/57e5b5e58667475c5a4a7f5b "

"past suggestion based off a single sale and less than a page on outpost and majority are killstreaks.

scm supports the raise and no sellers at 7.33 as well, this is fine"

the one that was in my inventory is the one i sold.....

It just seemed sketchy in the first place for a huge procentage...

you're saying this is a huge raise and i'm trying to price manipulate?

looking at my bp, i couldn't care less about a few scrap

and why is 1 sale sketchy? if you have counter-proof feel free to show it

Yes, but i just think its so wierd that you're saying sales istead of sale in your description...

i'll try my best to put 1 less letter in my next suggestion, i'll have to practice this for a while but maybe one day i can be able to do this!

thanks for the feedback!! :)

I didn't know that owning an item could prevent from suggesting a new price for it. Please, tell me more about it.

You don't understand, Blaze. You have put a "s" by mistake at the end of "sale". Therefore this suggestion is invalid, and all your capabilties in term of suggestion have to be questionned. Shame on you, Blaze. I trusted you. Everyone trusted you. You let the whole community down. Having to actually click the link in order to understand the "s" should not have been there, is a disgrace. You're confusing everyone because of a typo. How dare you.

#peopleareretarded

sorry :(

please don't be so harsh, i'm new to suggesting :((

That's not a reason. As the very wise Koni said just above, it is extremely weird that you said "sales". Like, so weird. Jesus. I'm impressed at how weird it is. It's such a big deal.

I need to stop the irony train here, but really, how can one be so bloody nitpicky, it's insane.

i find pretty funny that 4 people complained about that 1 letter haha

Letters and grammar are an important subject. :^)

There haven't been any new sellers at 7.33, and the buyers at 7.33 are still active, so I guess this should be fine. This can always be resuggested if it ends up being inaccurate.