Suggestion: Orbiting Planets Bonk Boy at 27 keys

Price Suggestion

~260 keys

o.plnts

600 votes up

107 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Sun, 06 Nov 16 11:47:34 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Sold:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/28448769 - sold for 27 keys

Credits to polar

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198071238509#!/compare/1471219200/1471305600 - off market sale at 23

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198071238509#!/compare/1471305600/1471392000 - that resold in a day at 26 in basically pure

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198166989223#!/compare/1475625600/1475712000 - likely a high outlier given all the b/os

Another one sold here for 33 keys

http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198045070194#!/compare/1477440000/1477526400

Maybe this'll need a range? 23 is a low outlier for sure as quickbuyers pay that much/more

Only solid evidence against the higher sales I see at this point is BurnFat reselling for 28; that other seller (the 8m old one) is selling it as a part of a 700 key set and is not selling individually. Not sure about this one,

so should i re-suggest at 27-33?

Im honestly not sure here; that relatively old sale at 30 mentioned in the comments would also support a range here. I'd personally prefer a range here, but I'd like a second opinion here

I think 27-33 should be fine here seeing as the 33 sale was for pure.

Taking the old 30 pure sale into account, we got three pure sales for the low, high and middle ends, so i'd say it's a fair representation of this item's market price.

i bought mine for 30 http://prntscr.com/cy49ij

sale is outdated

that trade is literally almost 3 months.

Oh noooo, a 3 month old trade is on my suggestion oooohhhh my gooood.

Seriously, a 3 month old trade is not going to be concidered ''old'', but i would understand a 6 month old trade is.

lol read the rules: http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-guide-for-unusual-price-suggestions/

" Sales older than 2 months old are not valid proof "

''Sales older than 2 months old are not valid proof; this does NOT mean that they are not useful. Feel free to include them to provide supplemental proof. Just don't rely on them to set your range.'

Please concider to read it through propely before trying to say something.

lol?

''Sales older than 2 months old are not valid proof" ok so not valid

"Just don't rely on them to set your range" not setting it in my range

i've read it and as many times as I've read it before, it still doesn't change the fact that the sale is not valid

In most cases sales up to 3 months old are usable, unless there are a lot of sales to compare which clearly isn't the case here.

that's only the case for high tier rare hats. and polar provided 3 other sales that occured, 2 of which were quicksells and 1 was an outlier so this should be fine

also to add, there is a seller on outpost for 28 keys for 8 months:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/27794866

Nice bait by disliking my comment, fam.

I guess 9 other people are doing it too

you're wrong, it's not bait