- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
I like crafting hats
You know what let's give this one a go!
Buyers @ 1.33
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/28519714
Scrap.tf
Pays 1.33 for EVERY Craft Hat
https://scrap.tf/hats
So that's a huge amount of evidence right there
https://backpack.tf/classifieds?q=classifieds&tradable=1&craftable=1&australium=-1&item=Random+Craft+Hat&quality=6&page=385
From this page on to page 467 there are buyers @ 1.33; a whole 82 Pages of buyers (Some aren't for craft hats)
https://backpack.tf/classifieds?q=classifieds&tradable=1&craftable=1&australium=-1&item=Random+Craft+Hat&quality=6&page=467
Sellers
1
https://backpack.tf/item/5206698223 - Young
1.11
https://backpack.tf/item/5015405380 - Young
1.22
https://backpack.tf/item/5158642278 - Young
https://backpack.tf/item/3685989269 - Young
https://backpack.tf/item/5176874249 - Young
Get the picture? All sellers @ 1.22 are Young/unbumped - Basically Invalid
Also look here:
https://backpack.tf/vote
Plenty of suggestions all day everyday for craft hats to go up to 1.33 (/TCP\ Moose Has done quite a few)
Als ocheck here:
https://backpack.tf/latest
Multiple suggestions accepted for craft hats to go up
Thanks =)
"Also look here:
https://backpack.tf/vote
Plenty of suggestions all day everyday for craft hats to go up to 1.33 (/TCP\ Moose Has done quite a few)
Als ocheck here:
https://backpack.tf/latest
Multiple suggestions accepted for craft hats to go up"
^ this isn't proof, come on man, don't be lazy, link the relevant suggestions. you didn't even screenshot the classifieds or scraptf. and a single outpost buyer does not constitute "Buyers @ 1.33"
besides, you might even be able to go 1.33-1.44
With ~56 pages of sellers @1.33 on the classies 1.44 should not be considered for the range, otherwise I fully agree with what you said.
You guys requested it some links to buyers profiles:
https://backpack.tf/u/76561198304350375
https://backpack.tf/u/76561198223840892
https://backpack.tf/u/76561198318361156
https://backpack.tf/u/76561198196324238
https://backpack.tf/u/76561198237669156
https://backpack.tf/u/76561198311820950
https://backpack.tf/u/76561198315588518
https://backpack.tf/u/76561198322813931
All these 24/7 Bots are buying multiple hats there are more but In a rush
I would say they should probably be 1.33 instead of 1.22 (for a normal one). However your proof probably isnt enough
You're at least going to need screenshots of those buyers at 1.33.
The profile links of the buyers would also greatly benefit your suggestion, since as others have said the proof for this looks really poor otherwise.
pretty sure you're going to need more proof... You'll need screenshots, not links.
Every single seller under 1.33 is unbumped / young. Quite clear that the diminishing absolute value on refined is having an effect here.