- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Hello, follow this: [] = All Buyers | {} = Best Buyers | () = Sellers
[All Buyers:
{ BEST Buyers:
http://imgur.com/a/5R3hA
1x 7.11REF 4 DAYS AGO
1x 7.00REF 2 DAYS AGO
}
Normal Buyers:
http://imgur.com/a/a74af
1x 6.88 4 Days Ago
2x 6.77 Less Than 1 hour
]
(Sellers:
1x Seller for 6.77 (Less Than 1 hour)
http://backpack.tf/item/5037752539
)
Have a nice day ;)
too many buyers at 6.77 to have that in range
downvoting
Current price seems to be fine. As Adolf said, buyers counter lower end, plus, buyer at 7.11 refined is irresponsive.
Oh dear, Hello Again,
1) No backpack.tf History Links
2) Range not valid either end no proof
2) Buyer @ 7.11 Is Invalid Unbumped, Last Online 22 Hours Ago
3) Buyer @ 7 Is Invalid Last Online 2 Days Ago
4) Buyer @ 6.88 Is Also Invalid Last Online 4 Days Ago
All 3 Buyers are countered by the sell listings and prove that buyers don't buy a thing
Sellers @ 6.77 are too young (Need to mature to 1 Day first)
5) 6.88 Is fine and this does not need changing for now
I have make the history link
1 History link to a sell listing that is young, unbumped and countered by loads of 24/7 Bots Buying @ 6.77
Dude just close this one
Thanks for the suggestion, but we're looking for meaningful changes on suggestions (changes >5% in value). Please find some sales and resuggest.