That would cap a full pure sale at a BO that is subject to change, and that makes no sense :P

the sellers BO obviously hasnt always been 30, as he declined 30 pure earlier on. This could be redone at 30-35, but I dont think its realistic to require someone to resuggest for accuracy when the data point we're changing here is clearly alternating; the uncertainty is going to be higher than the mean price change here.

Going to accept this as better than current, on account of 35 being full pure, which happened while the uncertain seller has been up. Im fine setting the low end here at 32 as it has been at 32 or lower for at least 28 days.