Price Suggestion
Reader's Choice
Submitted by ★ Paté (◕‿◕✿)
58.82%
n/a
1.44–1.66 ref
9
~3 ref
Unique Reader's Choice
50 votes up
35 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions
Sere
86.67%
2.88–3.11 ref
Not Luke
92.86%
2.88–3.33 ref
2.77–3.22 ref
DayronGames
90%
2.88–3.77 ref
2.88–3.33 ref

This suggestion was marked as bad price range and closed by Mindacos.

The price range was either too broad or did not accurately reflect how the item was traded. Therefore, this suggestion has been closed.

Message left by moderator:

Buyers at 1.55 counter 1.44 being in a range. Resuggest using a concrete sale(not a quickbuy from a bot), and use that as a flat value.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

How has this not been changed yet?


Look at those sales and buy offers!


http://imgur.com/a/WCLuA


Avatar ★ Paté (◕‿◕✿) · posted

    Where is 1.66 coming from if there's sellers for 1.33-1.55

    ★ Space · posted

      There is a buyer that is buying multiple at 1.55, which makes the value higher, right?

      Avatar ★ Paté (◕‿◕✿) · posted

        Yea, but there's sellers lower than buyers (idk why people do that but whatever)

        ★ Space · posted

          That is why I kept the radius fairly wide. 2.6 is deff. not the price. That has to be changed.

          Avatar ★ Paté (◕‿◕✿) · posted

            I just looked at classifieds again, the one for 1.33 sold

            ★ Space · posted

    You need actual trades that are accepted to make a unpriced - priced suggestion

    The only reason why this hat is 2.6 ref is because that's the price on the market, which is invalid pricing and proof

    This doesn't have a backpack.tf price, and therefore, this is an unpriced - priced suggestion

    Downvote

    Avatar ★ goobermaxxer · posted