Price Suggestion
Genuine Doe-Boy
Submitted by Bodomi
~8.78 ref
Genuine Doe-Boy
85 votes up
11 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by oblivion.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

3 Refined sale: http://i.imgur.com/OwVKXaL.gifv


Classifieds: http://i.imgur.com/kzw3pjH.png


___

Yes.

    I'm not so sure that you can completely exclude 2 peoples offers because they aren't quickbuys, you could probably raise it in between the two instead.

    Also one of your quickbuys went missing:

    https://backpack.tf/classifieds?item=Doe-Boy&quality=1&tradable=1&craftable=1&australium=-1


    Kenolis was bumped a day ago as well.

      They are countered by a large amount of quickbuyers.


      I also can't settle in-between something just because, one needs proof; I have proof for 3 Refined, there's no proof countering 3 Refined, only proof that supports it. I.E no one selling for below 3.11 Refined(except for the 2 invalid ones), bots quickbuying 2.77 and below.

        https://backpack.tf/classifieds?item=Doe-Boy&quality=1&tradable=1&craftable=1&australium=-1


        No I'm pretty sure 1 quickbuyer (Check link above) does not counter 2 normal sellers, also if your still stuck on quickbuyers, then there are 5 whole buy orders on the other side that are quickbuys, 3 for 2.66, 1 for 2.55, and 1 for 2.44.

          >also if your still stuck on quickbuyers, then there are 5 whole buy orders on the other side that are quickbuys, 3 for 2.66, 1 for 2.55.


          Yes. That's why the 2 sellers at 2.55 Refined are not valid.


          Anyways I'm done with you, you obviously do not know what you're talking about.

            I'm confused on how you are using the buy orders from 2.44 to 2.66 as support for 3.

            Just because the 2.55 sell orders are less than the 2.66 buy orders does not cause them to cancle each other out.

            Also the buy orders don't count as higher just because they are buy orders, if you could get proof from other cites, then you possiby could count it as 3, but currently you only have 1 seller as proof, and all the other proof you have is against your argument.