- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
1/1[*], not looking to sell this ever again.
Sale 1 (han → BUTTPLUNDER)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/28863713
The trade consisted of six items total which only were sold as a 'set'.
It sold for the listed price of 400 keys pure.[‡]
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198115775158#!/compare/1500768000/1501113600
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198115775158#!/compare/1500768000/1501113600
The keys do not show up in either comparison, as well it seems that the beak has been traded separately[§].
Valuing the Beak:
Total Value = 131.37
Beak Value 1 = 268.63 (400 - 131.37)
Sale 2 (BUTTPLUNDER → ptrckr)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/29310862
Sold for a Harvest Moon Beak (435, recently updated) and 200 pure.
http://i.imgur.com/O29nGbm.png
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198071943433#!/compare/1502150400/1502409600
https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198060233163#!/compare/1502323200/1502409600
Beak Value 2 = 635
Final Price
640 flat.
Dropping Sale 1 for a more accurate representation of the item's value. To get rid of the implausible large range[‖] and to take precedence[¶] over the newer sale.
Notes
* Known to bp.tf as of now.
‡ https://imgur.com/0S0NYau
§ https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198071943433#!/compare/1500940800/1501027200
‖ http://imgur.com/a/ap50u
¶ https://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/6033-guide-for-unusual-price-suggestions/ "Keep in mind, new sales should take precedence over older ones." (Part 1 → Sales → Exceptions)
Oooh i like that key :o And grats on the buy :o
Congratz on the sale!
Anyways, if I'm not mistaken, sale 1st is a bulk (some items sold for X amount of pure, we don't know what other items were priced at)
And you shouldn't round 635 when it's only sale. It doesn't matter that much since it's only 5 keys, but still^^
635 is already rounded, but no need to resuggest anymore, he bought for keeps anyway. Agreed and upvoted!
I'd agree with this, 635 is a perfectly fine number, shouldn't round to 640
Im not too sure about this. It has been for sale for a lot lower for a very long time. With sales as discrepant as they are here, I would be very unsure about using only the high sale out of two sales, especially since it has been available for so long at the lower value here.
If there is really nothing else, we sometimes give collectors the benefit of the doubt in situations like this, but it really feels like 640 is simply an outlier. With these discrepant sales and the time it took to sell in the low end sale, I would say this should not be updated.
I only removed the other sale because I got told to do so, I had it included initially.
Cannot argue about the long time it took to sale in the other trade though, if I'd have seen that trade I'd have bought it within a heartbeat.
I'd be sad to see this not getting updated, as I like my collector's items (say mostly 1/1) priced around the price I've paid for them and would always pay again.
I agree with Foamy here, it was just up for too long. If it was only 2 weeks or less maybe, but 10 weeks should have been enough time for everyone really interested to find it.
Gonna have to make the call now. Going to close it as it has simply been unsold lower for too long to see this as a proper reflection of its common trading point; sorry.
Nevertheless still a great hat; I hope you'll enjoy it equally despite it's price not being updated