Price Suggestion
~1.66 ref
Unique Hurt Locher
34 votes up
19 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions
Item Snapshot made
Classifieds
  • 1.88 ref
    #33774
    Unique Hurt Locher 84 Crafted 6320331978 6207321450
  • 1.88 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher 60 Found in Crate 6191217696 2044117190
  • 2 ref
    #19993
    Unique Hurt Locher 63 Crafted 6320215445 4465503240
  • 4.66 ref
    #24978
    Unique Hurt Locher 82 Crafted Australium Gold 6153958142 5088238132
  • 7.66 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher 15 Timed Drop The Bitter Taste of Defeat and Lime 5985162518 2634861386
  • 8 ref
    #24515
    Unique Hurt Locher 48 Crafted Team Spirit 6274454098 5029169722
  • 9 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher 92 Found in Crate The Bitter Taste of Defeat and Lime 6208416932 3603543493
  • 10.33 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher 31 Found in Crate An Extraordinary Abundance of Tinge 6207851134 4755172524
  • 14 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher 21 Found in Crate An Extraordinary Abundance of Tinge 5984120669 1992049542
  • 1 key
    Unique Hurt Locher 65 MvM Badge completion reward Team Spirit 5468068420 2391030556
  • 1.66 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher
  • 1.66 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher
  • 1.55 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher
  • 1.55 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher
  • 1.55 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher
  • 1.55 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher
  • 1.55 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher
  • 1.55 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher
  • 1.44 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher
  • 1.44 ref
    Unique Hurt Locher
n/a
0 sold recently

This suggestion was marked as bad price range and closed by oblivion.

The price range was either too broad or did not accurately reflect how the item was traded. Therefore, this suggestion has been closed.

Message left by moderator:

See comment

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

1 sale @ 2 refined - https://imgur.com/zsG63tq


https://imgur.com/ya4Tx71

buyers @ 1.66

Sellers @ 1.88


Suggesting 1.66-1.88

    If you have a sale at 2 refined, that should be in the range.

    Have the 1.66 buyers successfully bought any? If not, there's no reason to include that.