Sold for $189. With keys at $1.96 that is ~96 keys
Why do you ignore all the 6 sales under 100€ what happened in SCM during past few months and only took the highest spike in the sale history?
Because those are outdated? A month ago is already a stretch for normal items. Plus, I have a second sale to back it up and prove that it isn't an outlier.
Because the 2 most recent sales are both well above 100, I'm not using the older sales.
Considering how rare this item is, it's not supposed to sell multiple times in a month. Outdated or not, you picked the highest spike out of the items sale history instead of multiple sales for around under 100 before that.
"multiple"
There are 4 sales since october, which is roughly the 3-month mark. Anything past that is invalid, as it has always been, whether it's a 1 of 1 forever unusual or some odd thing such as this.
2 are at 46 keys, 1 is at 84, 1 is at 96.
The first sale at 46 keys happened over 3 months ago. That is way, way, way past any deadline. Even 1 of 1 unusuals that never sell cannot have suggestions including sales this old.
The second sale at 46 keys happened almost 3 months ago. A pretty big stretch.
The third sale, at 84 keys, happened a month ago, like over 50 days more recent than sale 2.
The fourth sale, at 96 keys, happened less than 3 weeks ago, over 2 months after sale 2 and almost 3 after sale 1.
You can see a consistent upward trend here. As there is nothing to disprove of this consistent upwards trend, there is no reason to include sales that are significantly older. That would be like describing bitcoin's price using what it was 2 weeks ago. It may seem recent, but it is not at all accurate.
If you do not agree, you are welcome to make your own suggestion on this. Otherwise, I'd advise you to bring a mod, or stop commenting.
EDIT: I can't count months, apparently. Still doesn't change the fact that the first two sales happened a while before the more recent ones.
http://steamcommunity.com/market/listings/440/Necro%20Smasher%20Strangifier
Sold for $210 1 month ago
=~84 Keys
http://prntscr.com/hm1jdm
Sold for $189. With keys at $1.96 that is ~96 keys
Why do you ignore all the 6 sales under 100€ what happened in SCM during past few months and only took the highest spike in the sale history?
Because those are outdated? A month ago is already a stretch for normal items. Plus, I have a second sale to back it up and prove that it isn't an outlier.
Because the 2 most recent sales are both well above 100, I'm not using the older sales.
Considering how rare this item is, it's not supposed to sell multiple times in a month. Outdated or not, you picked the highest spike out of the items sale history instead of multiple sales for around under 100 before that.
"multiple"
There are 4 sales since october, which is roughly the 3-month mark. Anything past that is invalid, as it has always been, whether it's a 1 of 1 forever unusual or some odd thing such as this.
2 are at 46 keys, 1 is at 84, 1 is at 96.
The first sale at 46 keys happened over 3 months ago. That is way, way, way past any deadline. Even 1 of 1 unusuals that never sell cannot have suggestions including sales this old.
The second sale at 46 keys happened almost 3 months ago. A pretty big stretch.
The third sale, at 84 keys, happened a month ago, like over 50 days more recent than sale 2.
The fourth sale, at 96 keys, happened less than 3 weeks ago, over 2 months after sale 2 and almost 3 after sale 1.
You can see a consistent upward trend here. As there is nothing to disprove of this consistent upwards trend, there is no reason to include sales that are significantly older. That would be like describing bitcoin's price using what it was 2 weeks ago. It may seem recent, but it is not at all accurate.
If you do not agree, you are welcome to make your own suggestion on this. Otherwise, I'd advise you to bring a mod, or stop commenting.
EDIT: I can't count months, apparently. Still doesn't change the fact that the first two sales happened a while before the more recent ones.