Suggestion: Green Energy Napoleon Complex at 50–60 keys

Although the baker boy sale is 2months old and probably an outlier considering a hard to sell taunt was involved, while FoD and showstopper are at 15. So please provide a proper mini on the taunt also Mohawk was an old sale as well just to let you know.

Few issues here:

I don't get your sale 4. It seems to have sold with the knife for a MG whirly for which there is no support that it should be 100. From the looks of it, that sale would've been way lower.

The peculiarity sale was a tradeback (going to comment there as well) so that really shouldn't be used here either.

That leaves the sales here at 37 and 50, where the mohawk mini may be on the high side, looking at current sellers. I think the range here will be too high

proportionally speaking that still leaves 37 out because 60 is a quite valid sale also keep in mind sellers at around 60+ so it makes no sense to wanting it to be valued at 46,5 instead of 55. So that comment on sale number 4 is definitely fair to say but that doesn't disprove the range

which 60 are we talking about here? I've pointed out issues with both sales listed at 60 here

which sale(s) are you talking about please state your problem with this suggestion in a logic format (make a structure) because now we are bound to misunderstand each other

Nevermind I understand what you mean:

First sale for the professors is here: https://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198000247762#!/compare/1521244800/1521331200

probably the second sale for that professor is just a regular trade since they didn't trade back the entire deal he just resold one of his received unusual back to him, still valid because of this. I do get why you think sale 4 is weak which I partially agree with except that I waited a long time at a buyout of 100keys and got what I wanted to set it at my B/O

What kind of structure do you want?

1. Peculiarity sale was a tradeback (same 2 people made lopsided trades, neither of which should be used on either suggestion). Aside from that, the peculiarity suggestion as it is has issues so that has to be revised as well. Eliminates sale 1

2. Sale 4 isnt 60; even at the outdated price that would be ~35, going by your minis. 60 there comes from nowhere, so that eliminates 60 as a data point from sale 2. To use that, you'd need a proper mini on the whirly and according to your suggestion, there isn't one.

3. the mohawk mini is probably too high on account of current sellers. I'm fine using that sale, but it is worth looking into the mohawk

true but 22days ago this was a lot different in value compare to seller so we have to take the old value since then the trade was commenced

The mohawk was already unsold when the suggestion was made so that does not change anything. Nothing else I have mentioned is any different from what it would have been when the suggestion was created.

nvm I forgot XD but still if you round it to 50 to make it look nice and clean it should be fine

Well taking the seller on the mohawk would make that 48-4 = 44 which by no means can be rounded to 50, and that's not that far off 37, or from what the whirly would be at without a mini for that matter.

On a separate note:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/29529847 the BO on sale 2 was 32, at which it should be capped.

That'd make the range here 32-44

2months is definitely still a valid recent sale..... if we have about 4 recent sales from under a month old

The time of the sale(s) isn't the issue here.

In case you're referring to the mohawk mini:

The two hats there are way outdated too and the unsold has been there for 3 full months looking at it's history. If you want to argue a range-mini on the mohawk, you'd need to fully update the belt and the jefe from your mohawk mini. Even then, the difference would likely be minimal

You’re really ruining my day since now I gotta make a new damm suggestion and hope no new sales accur. Sorry I’m not having a nice day I’ll update it later

Going to close now. Feel free to re-work and resuggest once the issues pointed out have been addressed.